Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: MAC Tournament Re-Seeding?
Page: 1 of 1
Eagle66
General User
E66
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329
person
mail
Eagle66
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 1:26 PM
What are your opinions on reseeding during the MAC tourney?  I was thinking about this today and wondered what the consensus was.   It probably makes less sense with all the byes, but in looking at the second round this year, we could end up with 5 vs 8 and 10 vs 11 in the second round.  I was thinking it may work if you reseed between rounds 1 and 2 only.  That way there wouldn’t be any sudden game time / opponent changes in Cleveland, but you still give the best teams the best chance to advance.  Thoughts?

Shawn Sellers
General User
SS
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 228
person
mail
Shawn Sellers
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 1:57 PM
Eagle66 wrote:expand_more
What are your opinions on reseeding during the MAC tourney?  I was thinking about this today and wondered what the consensus was.   It probably makes less sense with all the byes, but in looking at the second round this year, we could end up with 5 vs 8 and 10 vs 11 in the second round.  I was thinking it may work if you reseed between rounds 1 and 2 only.  That way there wouldn’t be any sudden game time / opponent changes in Cleveland, but you still give the best teams the best chance to advance.  Thoughts?



My Humble Opinion: I've never been a fan of re-seeding in the middle of a tournament. If the 10 and 11 seeds go on the road and beat the 6 and 7 seeds, they've earned the right to play each other.

Having said that, I'd be more open to reseeding in a conference tournament as opposed to the NCAA or other post season tournament. At least for a conference tournament, the seeding isn't based on human opinion.
Bobcat110
General User
Member Since: 3/5/2005
Location: Mount Gilead, OH
Post Count: 724
mail
Bobcat110
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 4:24 PM
Definitely not now with the top 2 seeds getting byes to semi's, but I don't think I'd like it even if still used old format. I think the bye's are enough protection/reward for top teams.  They need to earn the tourney from there on out and not worry if the other team gets to play a 6th seed instead of the 4th seed.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 4:50 PM
Giving the higher seeds byes accomplishes all you need.  I think you either reseed or give byes, not both.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 5:58 PM

I personally rail at the idea of reseeding. Always have, always will. For many reasons.

Play it like it falls.

Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 6:07 PM
I oppose reseeding.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 6:46 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more

I personally rail at the idea of reseeding. Always have, always will. For many reasons.

Play it like it falls.



Could not agree more.  Whoever came up with the idea of reseeding probably came up with the idea of every kid gets a trophy.  Very dumb idea.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 7:27 PM
Reseeding strikes me as on the opposite end of the spectrum of everyone gets a trophy.

And I'll be the contrarian. I'm in favor of it.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 8:37 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
And I'll be the contrarian. I'm in favor of it.


hahah if you were to be contrarian you would oppose it. To swim against the stream is totally expected of you.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 2/14/2013 10:01 PM
I suppose...

I'm surprised I'm the only one on this side of it. Oh well. I'm not unhappy with the current format. But if came to a vote, I'd check "yes."
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 2/15/2013 1:17 AM
I'd agree on doing one of bye/reseed but not both. Both are ways of favoring your top seeds, doing both seems excessive.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 2/15/2013 10:36 AM

Take an idea which has worked as planned and which has brought excitement--and re-work it.  Good idea.  You'll have great success in the business world.

JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 2/15/2013 6:43 PM
Successful businesses DO change things that work in order to stay ahead of the curve.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,559
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 2/15/2013 7:27 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more

I personally rail at the idea of reseeding. Always have, always will. For many reasons.

Play it like it falls.



Ditto.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 2/15/2013 8:28 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
Successful businesses DO change things that work in order to stay ahead of the curve.


They also change things because the relevant manager feels like he's got to put his own stamp on things. New Coke.
Last Edited: 2/15/2013 8:29:17 PM by mf279801
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 2/15/2013 9:51 PM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
Successful businesses DO change things that work in order to stay ahead of the curve.


They also change things because the relevant manager feels like he's got to put his own stamp on things. New Coke.


New Coke happened because they misinterpreted market research, not because of any ego trip.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 2/16/2013 3:23 AM
JSF wrote:expand_more
Successful businesses DO change things that work in order to stay ahead of the curve.


General, usually untrue statement (smart firms don't change unless for good reason).  How does it apply here anyway?
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 2/16/2013 11:56 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Successful businesses DO change things that work in order to stay ahead of the curve.


General, usually untrue statement (smart firms don't change unless for good reason).  How does it apply here anyway?


Good question. Why did you bring it up?
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 2/16/2013 1:37 PM
Nice non-answer.

If/when you join the real world, you'll know that there is far more change away from success by businesses for 'we-gotta-do-something' type bad reasons than for good reasons.

Re the MAC tourney which is fine and which hasn't even started, that is the case.  Find a better use for your time than fixing the unbroken.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 2/16/2013 1:44 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Nice non-answer.


So you bring up something and then expect me to justify how it applies? How does that work?

Quote:expand_more
If/when you join the real world


I'm not in the real world? What have I been doing?

... Am I being Truman Showed?

Quote:expand_more
Re the MAC tourney which is fine and which hasn't even started, that is the case.  Find a better use for your time than fixing the unbroken.


I didn't bring it up. Someone asked and I gave my answer. I even said I don't think it's a big deal. You're the one making a fuss.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 2/16/2013 1:55 PM
Actually if you don't constantly look to change and improve your business you are moving backwards in today's world.  That said, not sure this is a change that is necessary.  Now reseeding the Final Four is different discussion.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 2/16/2013 2:05 PM
Certainly, given low interest rates and the large cash on the balance sheet of many companies, it's a good time to consider aquisitions...that type of change.

How that compares with having the answer for everything and being dead-set certain that your opinions are CORRECT is another matter.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 2/16/2013 2:12 PM
Acquisitions, product extension/development, market expansion, distribution efficiency, anything to increase the value of the brand and business.  Question is does reseeding increase the value of the conference or tournament? 
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 2/16/2013 2:26 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
How that compares with having the answer for everything and being dead-set certain that your opinions are CORRECT is another matter.


Nowhere have I claimed my opinion is correct in this matter. It's merely my preference.

I withdraw my response if you were talking about yourself.
Showing Messages: 1 - 24 of 24
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)