Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Should the song "Rock 'n' Roll" (Gary Glitter) be played at the Convo?
Page: 2 of 2
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 2/26/2013 11:28 PM
Situation.  Like you have no interest in rehashing - especially the day before/of Akron.  And thanks again for the PM conversation. 

Because you got nothing out of the moment of silence is your take - that is fine and you are entitled to it.  Others perhaps did/do get something from it.  Silencing the music would probably be noticed by no one.  Unless an announcement was made as to what was being done and why....sounds vaguely familiar.

That said, I have no problem silencing the music.  Silence can be a powerful message. 

Now...forget the music.  It is all about Akron
20Wilken03
General User
W2003
Member Since: 1/18/2005
Post Count: 9
person
mail
20Wilken03
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 12:20 AM
Tim Burke wrote:expand_more
Its a song, grow up people.
Is it acceptable if the version played is a cover? How about if its just an instrumental by the band? What about at Bryd Arena, is it still okay to play it there?

Should the movie Top Gun be banned from polite society because they play Jerry Lee Louis's "Great Balls of Fire"?


Jerry Lee Lewis is not alive to receive royalties from the playing of his song.

Gary Glitter continues to receive royalties from the publishing rights as songwriter (through PRS) and those royalties are based entirely on how many times his song is performed (by, say, a marching band) or played (on the radio, in an arena, et cetera). He uses that money to travel to whatever country will allow him to stay (he's been kicked out of a dozen of them for raping children). 

So no, we should not be playing his music. While Glitter has divested himself of the recording rights and a large percentage of the publishing royalties, he still gets money every time you play the song, and he uses that money to do the very worst of things.


Jerry Lee Lewis is still alive and very much receiving royalties.

He was also blacklisted after his affairs went public. Radio stations banned his songs and his career was derailed. Now, 60 years later--It doesn't mean a thing. His songs are still played. His image is still well-known. It didn't make a difference in principle.

I like Rock 'n Roll Pt 2 as an arena song. It's a good tune. I have a lot of great memories (especially being a hockey fan) with that song. But if we're going to stop using it, it should be because of the chant that has become attached to it. Not because we think that we can make some kind of self-important statement that doesn't land. 

Tim Burke
General User
Member Since: 11/23/2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Post Count: 607
mail
Tim Burke
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 12:59 AM
20Wilken03 wrote:expand_more
. But if we're going to stop using it, it should be because of the chant that has become attached to it. Not because we think that we can make some kind of self-important statement that doesn't land. 



Yes, because trying to stop a child rapist is a self-important statement.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 10:19 AM
The Situation wrote:expand_more

P.S. I'm willing to overlook a musician's personal vices surrounding open drug use, petty crime, or homosexuality on a public scale because often they are not explicitly referenced in the song (at least not in the ones played at Ohio University sporting events). The real envelop pushing stuff is typically left for private consumption. But I don't !%&$ with child sex offenders. That's where my line is. Where's yours?



Never watch "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" again. Don't listen to NPR's "Wait wait don't tell me". Don't interact with the office of a certain New Jersey Senator or ex-florida congressman. And, obviously, never watch a woody allen movie.


Tim: I'm fairly sure that he would have gotten royalties when the 110 purchased the sheet music. Purchasing the music typically comes with a license allowing the band to play the music, or at least thats the way it worked for my high school marching band. If that is the case (I don't know if the 110 has purchased, of indeed ever played, the song) then disallowing the song in the future would have no impact on said rapist.
Last Edited: 2/27/2013 10:21:12 AM by mf279801
OU77BCJ
General User
OUBCJ77
Member Since: 11/18/2010
Post Count: 83
person
mail
OU77BCJ
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 10:43 AM
When talking about what never to watch, listen to or whatever, have to say it, going to Catholic Church, just saying.
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 11:02 AM

OU77BCJ wrote:expand_more
When talking about what never to watch, listen to or whatever, have to say it, going to Catholic Church, just saying.

If your priest is molesting children. Do everything in your power to stop him. But that in no way prevents you from gathering with two or more in His name.

Rebuking Gary Glitter does not mean you have to give up on music.

Some of you people are acting like I said the architect of the Convo was a pedophile and I want the building torn down.

A true hallmark of today's amoral society, you (OU77BCJ) throw that "just saying" in there at the end to absolve your statement from any judgement.

 

Last Edited: 2/27/2013 11:03:47 AM by The Situation
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 11:14 AM
Some one on here has to know how music royalties officially work. If what Tim Burke suggests is true, that Gary Glitter is receiving payment as a function of the number of times it gets played at the Convo, it really blows the doors off the situation.
Tim Burke
General User
Member Since: 11/23/2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Post Count: 607
mail
Tim Burke
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 11:18 AM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
Tim: I'm fairly sure that he would have gotten royalties when the 110 purchased the sheet music. Purchasing the music typically comes with a license allowing the band to play the music, or at least thats the way it worked for my high school marching band. If that is the case (I don't know if the 110 has purchased, of indeed ever played, the song) then disallowing the song in the future would have no impact on said rapist.


Two different things. The physical publishing rights give him royalties, but so do the performance rights. PRS (through its partnership with either ASCAP or BMI, which I believe it's BMI in this instance) uses various (and secretive, also controversial) techniques to measure how many times and in which places music gets performed. Believe it or not, there are agents around the country who go to places where music is performed or played and measure it. This is how local bars get shut down for allowing cover bands to play when the bar hasn't paid its annual dues to the publishing companies. The agents also regularly attend sporting venues to measure what and how songs are played.

It all eventually goes into this huge database by which they determine what portion of the lump sum gathering of annual payments goes to which songwriters. So songs that get performed often (such as R&Rpt2) earn a larger lump.

It's a miniscule percentage, but it's also a lump sum of several billion dollars. In the end Gary Glitter makes, I believe a publishing company agent estimated, somewhere north of six figures purely on performance of the song.
20Wilken03
General User
W2003
Member Since: 1/18/2005
Post Count: 9
person
mail
20Wilken03
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 11:18 AM
Tim: Not playing Gary Glitter won't stop a child rapist. Nor will playing his music encourage his actions. Also, know the difference between "rapist" and someone who was arrested for possession of child pornography--not to excuse that action, but there's a pretty big gap there. 
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 11:38 AM

20Wilken03 wrote:expand_more
Tim: Not playing Gary Glitter won't stop a child rapist. Nor will playing his music encourage his actions. Also, know the difference between "rapist" and someone who was arrested for possession of child pornography--not to excuse that action, but there's a pretty big gap there. 

This is an unreal conversation. 

What I'm hearing is: If given the personal choice to make a zero or non-zero contribution to a child sex offender by the simple act of playing his song, some on here would make a non-zero contribution. Because the songs sounds so damn good.

mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 11:38 AM
Tim Burke wrote:expand_more
Tim: I'm fairly sure that he would have gotten royalties when the 110 purchased the sheet music. Purchasing the music typically comes with a license allowing the band to play the music, or at least thats the way it worked for my high school marching band. If that is the case (I don't know if the 110 has purchased, of indeed ever played, the song) then disallowing the song in the future would have no impact on said rapist.


Two different things. The physical publishing rights give him royalties, but so do the performance rights. PRS (through its partnership with either ASCAP or BMI, which I believe it's BMI in this instance) uses various (and secretive, also controversial) techniques to measure how many times and in which places music gets performed. Believe it or not, there are agents around the country who go to places where music is performed or played and measure it. This is how local bars get shut down for allowing cover bands to play when the bar hasn't paid its annual dues to the publishing companies. The agents also regularly attend sporting venues to measure what and how songs are played.

It all eventually goes into this huge database by which they determine what portion of the lump sum gathering of annual payments goes to which songwriters. So songs that get performed often (such as R&Rpt2) earn a larger lump.

It's a miniscule percentage, but it's also a lump sum of several billion dollars. In the end Gary Glitter makes, I believe a publishing company agent estimated, somewhere north of six figures purely on performance of the song.


Wow, thats an impressive data gathering operation. Thanks for the info.
20Wilken03
General User
W2003
Member Since: 1/18/2005
Post Count: 9
person
mail
20Wilken03
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 11:45 AM
The Situation wrote:expand_more

Tim: Not playing Gary Glitter won't stop a child rapist. Nor will playing his music encourage his actions. Also, know the difference between "rapist" and someone who was arrested for possession of child pornography--not to excuse that action, but there's a pretty big gap there. 

This is an unreal conversation. 

What I'm hearing is: If given the personal choice to make a zero or non-zero contribution to a child sex offender by the simple act of playing his song, some on here would make a non-zero contribution. Because the songs sounds so damn good.



You better start cleaning out your iTunes library then. You have some work to do. 
The Situation
General User
Member Since: 7/13/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957
mail
The Situation
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 11:51 AM
20Wilken03 wrote:expand_more

Tim: Not playing Gary Glitter won't stop a child rapist. Nor will playing his music encourage his actions. Also, know the difference between "rapist" and someone who was arrested for possession of child pornography--not to excuse that action, but there's a pretty big gap there. 

This is an unreal conversation. 

What I'm hearing is: If given the personal choice to make a zero or non-zero contribution to a child sex offender by the simple act of playing his song, some on here would make a non-zero contribution. Because the songs sounds so damn good.



You better start cleaning out your iTunes library then. You have some work to do. 

Yeah I forgot about all of those road trips we've shared together. Good times. If I've made some oversights, enlighten me. I want to live as much of a child sex offender free life as possible.

KyleWvr13
General User
Member Since: 11/10/2010
Location: Pottstown, PA
Post Count: 503
mail
KyleWvr13
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 12:38 PM
Some of you guys worry about the littlest things sometimes.
Bleed Green & White
General User
Member Since: 12/27/2004
Location: Driving on US 33
Post Count: 164
mail
Bleed Green & White
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 1:13 PM
The Situation wrote:expand_more

Against Kent State (?), there was some sort of youth jump rope half time performance. One of the baselines used in the background was Gary Glitter's "Rock 'n' Roll"  (www.youtube.com/watch). Personally I think it's a catchy tune; one of the best stadium jams. However, Gary Glitter is a convicted sex offender (child pornography). And while often I'm able to separate a man from his work, I can no longer rest easy hearing this song played at the Convo with knowledge of his past.

The song is also typically played before the start of the second half. (It's the "Hey.... You SUCK!" song).

The poll question is to see if this is an appropriate song to be played at Ohio University events.

(Side note: At the Penn State game it was staggering for me to hear the student section do their traditional "Rock 'n' Roll" chant in light of all the recent events www.youtube.com/watch)

 




Have you expressed your concerns to the youth jump team that used said music.  Your efforts would be more efficient than arguing here with folks here.  

Rapist/child pornographer issue aside,  I am disappointed by the end of the chant where the Varsity Band clear as day yells "...and you're boyfriend too."  

If we are going to be nitpicky, arbiters of taste and defenders of public morals, we should also eliminate implied homophobic slurs.  We wouldn't accept similar racial taunts and we shouldn't allow these.  

(Start free speech argument now.)
Bobcat110alum
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 470
mail
Bobcat110alum
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 6:00 PM
Bleed Green & White wrote:expand_more

Against Kent State (?), there was some sort of youth jump rope half time performance. One of the baselines used in the background was Gary Glitter's "Rock 'n' Roll"  (www.youtube.com/watch). Personally I think it's a catchy tune; one of the best stadium jams. However, Gary Glitter is a convicted sex offender (child pornography). And while often I'm able to separate a man from his work, I can no longer rest easy hearing this song played at the Convo with knowledge of his past.

The song is also typically played before the start of the second half. (It's the "Hey.... You SUCK!" song).

The poll question is to see if this is an appropriate song to be played at Ohio University events.

(Side note: At the Penn State game it was staggering for me to hear the student section do their traditional "Rock 'n' Roll" chant in light of all the recent events www.youtube.com/watch)

 




Have you expressed your concerns to the youth jump team that used said music.  Your efforts would be more efficient than arguing here with folks here.  

Rapist/child pornographer issue aside,  I am disappointed by the end of the chant where the Varsity Band clear as day yells "...and you're boyfriend too."  

If we are going to be nitpicky, arbiters of taste and defenders of public morals, we should also eliminate implied homophobic slurs.  We wouldn't accept similar racial taunts and we shouldn't allow these.  

(Start free speech argument now.)


And why are you disappointed? Because our society isn't perfect and young kids do stupid stuff? 
Bobcat110alum
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 470
mail
Bobcat110alum
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 6:04 PM
I'm a redhead, and I'm now officially declaring that calling a redhead "ginger" or "Red" is unacceptable because it degrades people with red hair. Whenever I hear the word "Ginger" I cringe because it reminds me of the bullies that made fun of me for 10 years before I got to high school. I don't like it personally, so you guys aren't allowed to offend me anymore because I might relapse.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 6:09 PM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more



Wow, thats an impressive data gathering operation. Thanks for the info.[/QUOTE]

mf .. you know well the problems DCI (my involvement is with Cavaliers since 1975) and most bands getting rights to use and perform but my biggest dealing with ASCAP and BMI came when I was on the Board of Directors of the Muncie Y. THey had been playing WLBC in the weight rooms and lobby as background music.... the music nazis had exptrapolated that we owed several years of music fees amounting to close to a hundred thousnad dollars .....by their calculation. We negotiated a settlement but I regularly remind my staff that they can not play music in the lobby during office hours due to the problems with music right......(also I do not let them put my Rolling Stone mags on the rack .....to many fundamentalists round here

Sit,

this is an unwinnable battle that would not make a statement. With time and experience comes the wisdom of picking the battles that are winnable and actually mean something.
ts1227
General User
T1227
Member Since: 2/28/2006
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Post Count: 880
person
mail
ts1227
mail
Posted: 2/27/2013 6:51 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
I think the we need to revamp the pregame music and come up with some new stuff.  Like before the tip.  Getting a little stale.  


"Get Ready 4 This" was stale in the late 90's when ESPN put it on "Jack Jams". The only thing worse than the fact that we haven't changed a thing about the flow of a game in 7 years is that the stupid song was ever used at all.
Showing Messages: 26 - 44 of 44
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)