Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: NCAA (and NIT) Auto-Bids
Page: 1 of 1
Eagle66
General User
E66
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329
person
mail
Eagle66
mail
Posted: 3/11/2013 9:50 PM
Thought I would throw this out there for seeding purposes. Teams are listed in order by RPI (udpride.com). More upsets mean less NIT at-larges, but better seeding if Akron or Ohio win the tournament.

NCAA Auto-Bids
  • 6 - Gonzaga (WCC)
  • 18 - Belmont (Ohio Valley)
  • 25 - Creighton (MVC)
  • 60 - Valparaiso (Horizon)
  • 61 - Davidson (Southern)
  • 71 - South Dakota St. (Summit)
  • 92 - Florida Gulf Coast (Atlantic Sun)
  • 93 - Harvard (Ivy)
  • 96 - Iona (MAAC)
  • 155 - Western Kentucky (Sun Belt)
  • 185 - LIU Brooklyn (NEC)
  • 190 - James Madison (CAA)
  • 286 - Liberty (Big South)


NIT Auto-Bids (#1 seeds that didn't win their conference tournaments)
  • 29 - Middle Tennessee St. (Sun Belt) - NCAA At large possibility
  • 81 - Stony Brook (America East)
  • 121 - Robert Morris (NEC)
  • 128 - Niagara (MAAC)
  • 135 - Mercer (Atlantic Sun)
  • 159 - Northeastern (CAA)
  • 190 - Charleston Southern (Big South)

I'll try to keep this updated throughout the week.

Last Edited: 3/13/2013 8:10:57 AM by Eagle66
Eagle66
General User
E66
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329
person
mail
Eagle66
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 8:13 AM
Updated the RPI.  Looks like the NIT 8 seeds and at least half the 7s are gone.  I'd also guess Liberty, James Madison, LIU and the SWAC champion will be spending round 1 in Dayton as of right now.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 10:31 AM
IIRC last year the 4 lowest auto-bid teams played in dayton and the 4 lowest at-large-bid teams played in dayton. Does anyone know if thats the formal format going forward, or is there a chance that the 8 lowest bids overall (i.e. the 8 lowest auto-bids) will be relegated to the dayton games?
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 10:47 AM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
IIRC last year the 4 lowest auto-bid teams played in dayton and the 4 lowest at-large-bid teams played in dayton. Does anyone know if thats the formal format going forward, or is there a chance that the 8 lowest bids overall (i.e. the 8 lowest auto-bids) will be relegated to the dayton games?


It is for now but I'm guessing the money boys (who typically comprise the last four at larges) will get it changed in time.
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,948
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 11:45 AM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
IIRC last year the 4 lowest auto-bid teams played in dayton and the 4 lowest at-large-bid teams played in dayton. Does anyone know if thats the formal format going forward, or is there a chance that the 8 lowest bids overall (i.e. the 8 lowest auto-bids) will be relegated to the dayton games?


It is for now but I'm guessing the money boys (who typically comprise the last four at larges) will get it changed in time.


When it was just the 4 lowest auto-bid teams, tickets were $8 and it was one night. Now, tickets are $50 and it's over two nights. It will definitely stay this way as it makes the NCAA more money ($100 per seat vs. $8) and gives TV more product. If anything, I see more teams being added to the Tourney and this same First Four format being implemented at a site in addition to Dayton.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 12:27 PM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
When it was just the 4 lowest auto-bid teams, tickets were $8 and it was one night. Now, tickets are $50 and it's over two nights. It will definitely stay this way as it makes the NCAA more money ($100 per seat vs. $8) and gives TV more product. If anything, I see more teams being added to the Tourney and this same First Four format being implemented at a site in addition to Dayton.


I hadn't thought of it in that way.  You're probably correct.
Eagle66
General User
E66
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329
person
mail
Eagle66
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 2:28 PM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
IIRC last year the 4 lowest auto-bid teams played in dayton and the 4 lowest at-large-bid teams played in dayton. Does anyone know if thats the formal format going forward, or is there a chance that the 8 lowest bids overall (i.e. the 8 lowest auto-bids) will be relegated to the dayton games?


It is for now but I'm guessing the money boys (who typically comprise the last four at larges) will get it changed in time.


When it was just the 4 lowest auto-bid teams, tickets were $8 and it was one night. Now, tickets are $50 and it's over two nights. It will definitely stay this way as it makes the NCAA more money ($100 per seat vs. $8) and gives TV more product. If anything, I see more teams being added to the Tourney and this same First Four format being implemented at a site in addition to Dayton.


Plus those teams who play in the first four also get an extra game share for the tourney correct?  Maybe they change it to the last four auto vs the last 4 at large, then the big conference teams can play the bottom 4 teams, they still keep the gate and add an extra game share as well.
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,948
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 2:36 PM
Eagle66 wrote:expand_more
IIRC last year the 4 lowest auto-bid teams played in dayton and the 4 lowest at-large-bid teams played in dayton. Does anyone know if thats the formal format going forward, or is there a chance that the 8 lowest bids overall (i.e. the 8 lowest auto-bids) will be relegated to the dayton games?


It is for now but I'm guessing the money boys (who typically comprise the last four at larges) will get it changed in time.


When it was just the 2 lowest auto-bid teams, tickets were $8 and it was one night. Now, tickets are $50 and it's over two nights. It will definitely stay this way as it makes the NCAA more money ($100 per seat vs. $8) and gives TV more product. If anything, I see more teams being added to the Tourney and this same First Four format being implemented at a site in addition to Dayton.


Plus those teams who play in the first four also get an extra game share for the tourney correct?  Maybe they change it to the last four auto vs the last 4 at large, then the big conference teams can play the bottom 4 teams, they still keep the gate and add an extra game share as well.


I know when they first started the Play-in Game (predecessor to the First Four) with the two worst teams they did not get a full share. But the schools participating didn't care because they split that money evenly with the conference so the loss of revenue wasn't great to them. In return, they got treated like royalty (an NCAA Charter would pick them up Sunday night), got the Tuesday night spotlight and 1 of the teams/coaches got to put NCAA wins on their resumes.

I'm not sure how the money is split in the current First Four format.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 2:50 PM
I believe it is a full share.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 3/13/2013 5:18 PM
I thought I read somewhere that all the at-large last 4 teams get a full-share, but if they win they do not get an additional share for the next round game.  So USF last year got 2 shares despite playing in 3 games.
Showing Messages: 1 - 10 of 10
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)