I think he meant restricted. For example, a gift to your favorite sport gets you points but not benefits (seat consideration). I also heard this one today - if you give $1000 to your favorite sport, you aren't technically considered a Bobcat Club member. You'd have to give a minimum of $75 more to the obc to be considered a member.
That is...idiotic. So you're saying that if I give $100,000 to basketball, that I have to donate $75 to be considered a member? Makes no sense and seems very short-sighted, if true.
Well, this scenario would involve two separate "fails". One on the part of the contributor for not becoming better informed, another on the part of the OBC for not completely informing the contributor.
How is the contributor not better informed, if a person wants to give to a certain sport, that is automatically a restricted gift and does not get you OBC membership, nor does it boost your OBC contribution. This is clearly outlined in the literature. Talking to two olympic sports coaches while in town for homecoming and they indicated that OBC penalities for restricted contributions is hurting how they operate.
Last Edited: 10/15/2013 1:44:16 PM by BillyTheCat