Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Ken Pomeroy's Conference Simulations
Page: 1 of 1
Eagle66
General User
E66
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329
person
mail
Eagle66
mail
Posted: 1/1/2014 5:55 PM
Link to to kenpom.com blog 

Quote:expand_more
This is part two of my look at every conference race using a Monte Carlo and my current ratings for each team. The listed numbers are how many simulations each team won out of 10000, so divide that number by 100 to get the percent chance I am giving each team of winning the one-seed for its conference tournament. (Note: not all teams listed are eligible for their conference tournament, so in some cases it’s a mythical one-seed.) If a team isn’t listed, I didn’t forget about them - they didn’t win a single simulation.

Conferences are ordered from least to most competitive. I’ll tackle the ten-most competitive conference races in the final part tomorrow. The following results include all games played through yesterday.

Quote:expand_more
19. MAC

The pick: Toledo. The Rockets’ unbeaten run ended at Kansas on Monday night, but their streak of scoring at least 1.08 PPP in every game didn’t.

The contrarian pick: Eastern Michigan. Rob Murphy’s team has been the surprise of the conference so far, and convincing wins over Green Bay and Cleveland State are solid evidence that they’ll win a few games in league play.

Toledo                 5087
Ohio                   2264
Akron                   818
Eastern Michigan        573
Western Michigan        440
Buffalo                 403
Kent St.                334
Bowling Green            64
Miami OH                 13
Ball St.                  4
Northern Illinois         2
Last Edited: 1/1/2014 5:57:16 PM by Eagle66
bobcat2nc
General User
B2
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Post Count: 584
person
mail
bobcat2nc
mail
Posted: 1/1/2014 7:09 PM
PPP? In reference to Toledo?
Lande71
General User
L71
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 275
person
mail
Lande71
mail
Posted: 1/1/2014 7:18 PM
points per possession?
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 1/1/2014 7:26 PM
Lande71 wrote:expand_more
points per possession?
Correct.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 1/1/2014 9:55 PM
I am curious how these numbers would play out if we could isolate the fact that our divisional crossover opponents rank #1 and #4 in this simulation while Toledo's are #2 and #8 (bg)

Toledo 5087
Ohio 2264
Akron 818
Eastern Michigan 573
...
Bowling Green 64


No doubt about it, the fact that we got the West's two best teams as divisional doubles is a bummer but I think this team is up for it. Hopefully MAC play goes more like Richmond and less like Oakland.

A birdie to open at Kent would be HUGE.
Last Edited: 1/1/2014 9:56:14 PM by The Optimist
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 1/2/2014 12:04 AM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
No doubt about it, the fact that we got the West's two best teams as divisional doubles is a bummer but I think this team is up for it.
.


Want to be the best ya gotta play the best....so then we get 2 wins ....and then we got to endure the ever present folks who preach what happens when the 2 meet for the third time. "well it;s hard to beat a team 3 times in a season"
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 1/2/2014 10:59 AM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
No doubt about it, the fact that we got the West's two best teams as divisional doubles is a bummer but I think this team is up for it.
.


Want to be the best ya gotta play the best....so then we get 2 wins ....and then we got to endure the ever present folks who preach what happens when the 2 meet for the third time. "well it;s hard to beat a team 3 times in a season"
I agree with borna, I don't necessarily think it's a bad thing. Good battles in conference toughen you up for tournament time, and we are always complaining about the west tanking our RPI... Well, on that front, we have the right teams doubled up.
bobcat2nc
General User
B2
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Post Count: 584
person
mail
bobcat2nc
mail
Posted: 1/2/2014 1:57 PM
Thanks for the answer to my question.  For some reason my brain would not function at that time.  
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 1/2/2014 3:42 PM
As good as Toledo has been on offense they have been nearly as bad on defense.  They are #254 in defensive PPP at 1.071.  In contrast we are #51 at 0.934.   Their perimeter defense has been horrid with teams shooting over 40% from three against them.  But their offensive metrics are absurdly good.  They play at a high tempo and don't turn the ball over (10th nationally in turnover %).
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 1/2/2014 5:57 PM
I don't know how much credence to give to Kenpom, I hear him referenced a lot in the beginning of seasons but I never seem to remember hearing much about how his predictions panned out.
Showing Messages: 1 - 10 of 10
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)