Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
1/12/2024 3:51 PM
You're making my point for me, but I will play this game with you.
George Mason is on their 3rd coach in 3 years.
FAU's coach just signed a 10-year $15M dollar deal.
Stephens has a $420K base. And a host of various other compensation accelerators and bonuses worth $100K+, similar to what Boals and others have.
Not exactly poverty wages for a 1st time head coach. And not a far cry from the $592K which Boals is receiving in base. Or the $502K he received in his 1st year at OU.
"Pay coaches less, the way to bring in better recruits! BLSS 2024"
https://govsalaries.com/jeffrey-donald-boals-84516568 https://www.ohio.edu/hr/compensation-pay/salary-databaseI don't actually know your point, honestly. This thread is about how we lost a big recruit that we went hard after because somebody else gave him $90,000. I'm suggesting ways that we can find money to pay for said players, and given Baker's proposal it sounds like it's likely how NCAA basketball will work soon. Where do you think that money's gonna come from?
And how well is Boals recruiting now with the top salary in the league? I'm struggling to see the correlation between Boals' salary and recruiting success. It seems like recruiting success -- in this case -- came from finding $90k for a player.
I don't think it's some wild idea to think that we're going to reallocate some of our revenue to the players, and that less money will go to coaching salaries not only at OU, but across college basketball. Like I said, just labor market dynamics. We either need more revenue, or we need to allocate what we have differently.
And the fact that these aren't poverty wages supports my point of view, right? That there are coaches in our league that make 200k less than Boals seems quite relevant given that we're losing recruits over 90k.
Last Edited: 1/12/2024 3:53:08 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame