I find it odd that the language being used with Tariq's handler, and other players' handlers, is that their expectation is if there's a coaching change then an LOI release should be automatic and the new coach is expected to go to the back of the line and enter the recruiting process just like everybody else. It completely cuts off the idea that the person who signed the LOI should FIRST give the new coach a listen, and then if things don't click an immediate release should be granted.
In sales we talk about not selling on the cancellation. In other words, don't get the customer to buy your product today by selling them on their ability to return it for a refund if they change their mind. Too often, they change their mind. Its better to make a sale that will stick by selling it as a completed transaction.
So my question is, how are these LOIs sold? Are they sold as a commitment to the coach or to the school? Does the coach reassure them by saying "look, I'm not going anywhere, but if I do, you can back out, no problem, the school will understand."? Or is it not mentioned at all, and if not should it be? I ask because this won't be the last time we see a recruit want to transfer during a coaching change, but am curious to know if there's any way to try to avoid it from happening like this.
Last Edited: 4/15/2014 4:44:15 PM by perimeterpost