Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: The Post on the CIT
Page: 1 of 2
Jim G
General User
JG
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 82
person
mail
Jim G
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 11:57 AM
http://thepost.ohiou.edu/content/mens-basketball-ohios-ci...

The numbers don't add up. Total attendance for the CIT was 10528. But only 3140 tickets were sold? Are you telling me that 7388 tickets were given away? If all 10528 tickets are sold at $10 the sales would be at $105280. With the 112893.50 price tag to host the games the net loss would only be $7613.50. Not bad when that doesn't include concessions.

 
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 12:06 PM
Yeah, something doesn't add up. Student tickets were free, so that accounts for a lot of that discrepancy, but there is no way 70 percent of attendees were students. In fact, the student crowds were quite small.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 12:08 PM
Jim G wrote:expand_more
http://thepost.ohiou.edu/content/mens-basketball-ohios-ci...

The numbers don't add up. Total attendance for the CIT was 10528. But only 3140 tickets were sold? Are you telling me that 7388 tickets were given away? If all 10528 tickets are sold at $10 the sales would be at $105280. With the 112893.50 price tag to host the games the net loss would only be $7613.50. Not bad when that doesn't include concessions.

You are right. Ohio has accounting as a major ....right? Seems like it is simple math from the outside eh? 

 
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 12:56 PM
$78,000 is "substantial"?
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,643
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 2:47 PM
I have to check with my colleague Slavin, but as a resident CPA, I conclude this definitely does not add up.
Dexcat
General User
Member Since: 11/6/2013
Post Count: 119
mail
Dexcat
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 3:34 PM
Jim G wrote:expand_more
http://thepost.ohiou.edu/content/mens-basketball-ohios-ci...

The numbers don't add up. Total attendance for the CIT was 10528. But only 3140 tickets were sold? Are you telling me that 7388 tickets were given away? If all 10528 tickets are sold at $10 the sales would be at $105280. With the 112893.50 price tag to host the games the net loss would only be $7613.50. Not bad when that doesn't include concessions.

 

My guess is this column goes with the many other columns that the general fee shouldn't be used for sports that the post has written over the years. In so that it twisted numbers or purposely left things out. The student crowds were much smaller, there is no way that 7000+ tickets were given away.

Also, there is no indication that there were any concessions or advertising revenue either. Was the overall endeavor a loss for OU, probably. Even at $78,000 for such a large school, it would probably go unnoticed, however, I feel that the loss (if there is one) is much smaller.

 
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,821
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 4:04 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
http://thepost.ohiou.edu/content/mens-basketball-ohios-ci...

The numbers don't add up. Total attendance for the CIT was 10528. But only 3140 tickets were sold? Are you telling me that 7388 tickets were given away? If all 10528 tickets are sold at $10 the sales would be at $105280. With the 112893.50 price tag to host the games the net loss would only be $7613.50. Not bad when that doesn't include concessions.

You are right. Ohio has accounting as a major ....right? Seems like it is simple math from the outside eh? 

 


I don't think Accounting 101 or 102 are required courses for Journalism majors. Could be wrong, but I doubt it.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,800
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 4:36 PM
Athletics fudging on announced attendance is noting new, so not sure where the surprise is. And apparently those numbers were from a FOI request, so one would consider the numbers to be factual. Opportunities such as this are investments, we hash this out all the time, what's the benefit for each extra game of having the OHIO Mark roll across the news ticker of ESPN?
Last Edited: 6/11/2014 4:39:57 PM by BillyTheCat
Bobcatbob
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Coolville, OH
Post Count: 1,351
mail
Bobcatbob
mail
Posted: 6/11/2014 4:48 PM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
I have to check with my colleague Slavin, but as a resident CPA, I conclude this definitely does not add up.


Tsk. Tsk. Non-industry CPA's, perhaps, and why you are forgetting the principle tenet of management accounting.  The first question is always:  "What do you want it to be?".
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 12:47 AM
Info/context/definition lacks.  Difficult to believe that only 1200 tix per game were sold.  I couldn't attend but I think that I bought a ticket for each game.
Kevin Finnegan
General User
KF
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Location: Rockton, IL
Post Count: 1,214
person
mail
Kevin Finnegan
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 10:23 AM
It's fun to play the 'What If' game with the CIT.

What if Ohio hadn't played in the CIT this year? Would a 23-11 record get Christian a new job? Would we ever hear about Jon Smith leaving the team disgruntled at the direction of the team?

What if Campbell doesn't hit the free throws against Cleveland State and push us on? Does 23-12 get him a new position? Do we keep our recruits?

What if Wright State finishes us out the following game instead of fading at the end? Does 24-12 sound as good to BC?

What if we completed the comeback against VMI instead of falling 92-90 after trailing by 12 with three minutes left? That game was on Wed, March 26th. The next game wasn't until April 1st, two days after Christian had his first interview with BC. If Ohio's still playing, does he interview? Does BC look elsewhere?

Without the CIT, it's likely Christian is still our coach, for better or worse. So if we're doing the accounting of the CIT, maybe it should include the Christian buyout,, because that was money the university earned through the tournament. Wasn't that something like $250,000? Pretty nice chunk of change. And going off what I've read, it sounds like we may have upgraded
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 11:11 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Athletics fudging on announced attendance is noting new, so not sure where the surprise is. And apparently those numbers were from a FOI request, so one would consider the numbers to be factual. Opportunities such as this are investments, we hash this out all the time, what's the benefit for each extra game of having the OHIO Mark roll across the news ticker of ESPN?


10 weeks to provide a response to an open records request is a very long time. 
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 12:01 PM
finnOhio wrote:expand_more
It's fun to play the 'What If' game with the CIT.

What if Ohio hadn't played in the CIT this year? Would a 23-11 record get Christian a new job? Would we ever hear about Jon Smith leaving the team disgruntled at the direction of the team?

What if Campbell doesn't hit the free throws against Cleveland State and push us on? Does 23-12 get him a new position? Do we keep our recruits?

What if Wright State finishes us out the following game instead of fading at the end? Does 24-12 sound as good to BC?

What if we completed the comeback against VMI instead of falling 92-90 after trailing by 12 with three minutes left? That game was on Wed, March 26th. The next game wasn't until April 1st, two days after Christian had his first interview with BC. If Ohio's still playing, does he interview? Does BC look elsewhere?

Without the CIT, it's likely Christian is still our coach, for better or worse. So if we're doing the accounting of the CIT, maybe it should include the Christian buyout,, because that was money the university earned through the tournament. Wasn't that something like $250,000? Pretty nice chunk of change. And going off what I've read, it sounds like we may have upgraded


Insightful line of thinking!
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 12:23 PM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
It's fun to play the 'What If' game with the CIT.

What if Ohio hadn't played in the CIT this year? Would a 23-11 record get Christian a new job? Would we ever hear about Jon Smith leaving the team disgruntled at the direction of the team?

What if Campbell doesn't hit the free throws against Cleveland State and push us on? Does 23-12 get him a new position? Do we keep our recruits?

What if Wright State finishes us out the following game instead of fading at the end? Does 24-12 sound as good to BC?

What if we completed the comeback against VMI instead of falling 92-90 after trailing by 12 with three minutes left? That game was on Wed, March 26th. The next game wasn't until April 1st, two days after Christian had his first interview with BC. If Ohio's still playing, does he interview? Does BC look elsewhere?

Without the CIT, it's likely Christian is still our coach, for better or worse. So if we're doing the accounting of the CIT, maybe it should include the Christian buyout,, because that was money the university earned through the tournament. Wasn't that something like $250,000? Pretty nice chunk of change. And going off what I've read, it sounds like we may have upgraded


Insightful line of thinking!


Agreed!!  I want to say the buyout was something like $500,000, which Ohio used to hire Coach Phillips.

Which leads to another point-taking Finn's line of thinking even further, without the CIT, is Phillips, whom a significant amount of the board sees as a potential improvement over JC (myself included) our coach?
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,763
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 3:37 PM
I hardly think that that a few wins in an also ran tournament got him that job. It's like the menu item at a local German eatery: the best of the wurst.
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 7:23 PM
I guess you could also ask the same question about his hire at Ohio- did his advancement to the quarterfinals of the CBI his last season at TCU in any way effect Schaus's decision to hire him? I'm guessing probably not, and with BC's AD being from the MAC and the guy he hired to assist with the search knowing JC I doubt it made a difference for them either. But an interesting possibility though.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 8:51 PM
From an educational standpoint, requiring that all students take Accounting 101 would be amazing. The concepts taught in that class are a great basis to develop your personal finance habits around as you move into the real world.

That said, hardest class I ever took. By far. Making that a requirement would create mass havoc. 

Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,643
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 10:56 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
From an educational standpoint, requiring that all students take Accounting 101 would be amazing. The concepts taught in that class are a great basis to develop your personal finance habits around as you move into the real world.

That said, hardest class I ever took. By far. Making that a requirement would create mass havoc. 


I don't know about requiring ACCT 101, but I have been saying for years that high schools should require a personal finance class.  It would do wonders.
catfan28
General User
C28
Member Since: 6/11/2011
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 1,503
person
mail
catfan28
mail
Posted: 6/12/2014 11:03 PM
Does it really matter? Old news. JC is gone, we have Saul. I think most would agree we got the better part of that deal. Let's just move on here...
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 6/13/2014 8:57 AM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
From an educational standpoint, requiring that all students take Accounting 101 would be amazing. The concepts taught in that class are a great basis to develop your personal finance habits around as you move into the real world.

That said, hardest class I ever took. By far. Making that a requirement would create mass havoc. 

I don't know about requiring ACCT 101, but I have been saying for years that high schools should require a personal finance class.  It would do wonders.


Agreed - personal finance to include understanding insurance for the consumer.  Frankly, this is a class that should also be a required part of a college curriculum as well.
Ozcat
General User
Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Gahanna, OH
Post Count: 820
mail
Ozcat
mail
Posted: 6/13/2014 10:54 AM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
I don't know about requiring ACCT 101, but I have been saying for years that high schools should require a personal finance class.  It would do wonders.

Yes.
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
Agreed - personal finance to include understanding insurance for the consumer.  Frankly, this is a class that should also be a required part of a college curriculum as well.

Double yes.

I have clients with PHDs who don't understand basic finance.  Then again, that's how I make a living so I can't complain too much.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,821
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 6/13/2014 1:47 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
From an educational standpoint, requiring that all students take Accounting 101 would be amazing. The concepts taught in that class are a great basis to develop your personal finance habits around as you move into the real world.

That said, hardest class I ever took. By far. Making that a requirement would create mass havoc. 


Ditto. I actually took an Accounting class in high school and thought that I was going to be ok going into Accounting 101 in Copeland Hall. High school accounting was basically balancing a checkbook. Mwhahahahaha then you get to the real stuff at OU and then barely pass and have to explain to your parents why your GPA is so low.
Last Edited: 6/13/2014 1:48:06 PM by GoCats105
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 6/13/2014 1:58 PM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more

I don't know about requiring ACCT 101, but I have been saying for years that high schools should require a personal finance class.  It would do wonders.


It should at least be a requirement for all student athletes entering any professional sports draft.  They might not need to handle their own finances but they should at least know the basics of personal finances so they'll know whether their agent/advisor is robbing them blind.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 6/13/2014 3:23 PM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
From an educational standpoint, requiring that all students take Accounting 101 would be amazing. The concepts taught in that class are a great basis to develop your personal finance habits around as you move into the real world.

That said, hardest class I ever took. By far. Making that a requirement would create mass havoc. 

I don't know about requiring ACCT 101, but I have been saying for years that high schools should require a personal finance class.  It would do wonders.


Because if there's a crowd willing and eager to learn financial responsibility, it's high schoolers.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 6/13/2014 3:28 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
Because if there's a crowd willing and eager to learn financial responsibility, it's high schoolers.


Oddly enough, the kids I have been interacting with the past 10 years seem to be increasingly more aware of personal finances and cost of things as well as better at making money decisions than the previous 2 decades. I am not sure if the economy and the increase in kids with jobs has anything to do with it or if the next generation's obsession with getting rich has anything to do with it but there is a fundamental change in how they handle and think about money.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 37
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)