Did the officials not have the same view as we did on TV off the tip off the finger of a Duke player that was called Duke's ball and not overturned upon review in the last 2:00 minutes? I thought the purpose of the review was to actually get the call right. Silly me.
It's one of those things that bugs me about replay. Looking at that replay, I'd say it was 95 percent likely it went off the Duke player's finger. I'd leave some room for a slight bit of doubt that maybe the one angle that seemed to indicate that was deceiving. To me, that's still conclusive enough to overturn it. But maybe it's not, or maybe the guy watching the replay didn't think it was that certain. How conclusive does something have to be to overturn a call in any sport?
At any rate, I don't think it would have changed the outcome, but it still bothers me that we didn't get to find out for sure.