Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Best and worst coaches in NCAA Tourney?
Page: 1 of 1
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,946
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 3/31/2015 2:18 PM

FiveThirtyEight.com put together a list of which coaches outperformed/underperformed in the NCAA Tournament based upon their teams' seeds. Some interesting names on the list. Now, part of me says that the guys who underperformed could be very good coaches who got the most out of not very talented team in the regular season. Then, they were found out in the NCAA Tourney. Or maybe they just stink (but not too bad because they did get a team to the NCAA Tournament), I'm not smart enough to figure that out.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/tom-izzo-michigan-state-coaching-final-four/

GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,820
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 3/31/2015 2:21 PM
Interesting. Maybe I'll take this into account next year if I fill out a bracket.

Not surprised to see Rick Barnes so far down that list. I never understood the love he continued to get for so long in Austin. I understand Texas is a football school, but with the talent he's had around him he has grossly underachieved.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 3/31/2015 2:25 PM
Way to go #33!
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 3/31/2015 2:27 PM
Some awfully big names there at the bottom.


Just wondering but how do you get 46.2 wins?
Last Edited: 3/31/2015 2:30:03 PM by OUVan
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,946
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 3/31/2015 2:34 PM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
Some awfully big names there at the bottom.


Just wondering but how do you get 46.2 wins?
That's expected future wins. Calipari probably has 47 wins and a 60% chance of winning the last two.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 4/1/2015 10:52 AM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
Some awfully big names there at the bottom.


Just wondering but how do you get 46.2 wins?
That's expected future wins. Calipari probably has 47 wins and a 60% chance of winning the last two.
I guess vacated wins count.
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 4/1/2015 11:27 AM
cc-cat wrote:expand_more
Some awfully big names there at the bottom.


Just wondering but how do you get 46.2 wins?
That's expected future wins. Calipari probably has 47 wins and a 60% chance of winning the last two.
I guess vacated wins count.
Unless you exclude the whole season from the sample, it would not compute fairly. Those seasons where he has vacated tournament wins, he would be credited as losing in the first round when his team was expected to advance to some late round, making it seem that he coached poorly or underperformed in the tournament, which wasn't the actual issue.
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,756
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 4/1/2015 8:18 PM
No Thad Matta on either list?
5KMD
General User
KMD5
Member Since: 8/8/2012
Location: Wexford, PA
Post Count: 48
person
mail
5KMD
mail
Posted: 4/2/2015 12:45 PM
Interesting table.

Hard for coaches like K, Bill Self to get much traction above zero since Kansas and Duke always seem to be 1 seed. Because of great recruiting and succesful regular seasons it is hard for some coaches to get wins they weren't "supposed" to win.

Definitely one piece of the puzzle though. However, Izzo still has only one 1 championship and is 1-8 against Duke so not sure what this means for saturday's matchup. I'll take Duke because of more talented basketball players.
Showing Messages: 1 - 9 of 9
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)