Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Does the MAC tourney format perpetuate the "mid-major" image?
Page: 1 of 1
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 5/14/2015 12:29 PM
According to a PD article on the Horizon's revamp, it does. http://www.cleveland.com/sports/college/index.ssf/2015/05...
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,643
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 5/14/2015 12:57 PM
Completely disagree. So because there are 4 games played at campus sites, none of which involve the top 4 seeds...and because the women's tournament is at the same place around the same time...we are viewed a small-time mid-major? I think what would perpetuate that more than anything is having games with virtually no attendance as those 1st round games would be.
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 5/14/2015 2:20 PM
Have talked about this before but the problem with the Tournament is the extended byes coupled with an uneven 18 game regular season. I think we should mirror the PAC 12 who also have 12 teams and an 18 game regular season and go with a 12 team, 4 round play off where the top 4 teams get a single bye to the quarterfinals. The tournament would be wed-sat.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,123
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 5/14/2015 4:03 PM
I doubt most would ever bring this up when talking about why the MAC is a mid-major.

The MAC is a mid-major due to a long history of low funding of athletics and the dominant status of the Big 10 in the region.
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 5/15/2015 10:55 AM
I think creating a scenario that has the best eight teams in Cleveland playing Thurs/Fri/Sat is best for the league and the fans. I'm not opposed to the double bye for seeds 1-2, but at that point, I've never felt seeds 3-4 deserve better treatment than 5-10.

There are ways to make it better than it is now, and still reward the top two teams in the league for having the best regular season.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,761
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 5/15/2015 2:02 PM
The Horizon stacked the deck for the regular season winner and top teams. Rightly so, as they are a one bid league like the MAC. Why take the chance that an 8th seeded team wins the bid, then gets a 16 seed and loses to a number 1 seed by 50? Dress it up any way you like. The Horizon and the MAC are mid-major.
Showing Messages: 1 - 6 of 6
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)