Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: CMU embarrassed in Florida
Page: 1 of 1
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 11/25/2015 10:29 PM
Went 0-3 in tournament with one major blowout. Their best player, Chris Fowler, is out with an injury.

The past few days haven't been very good for the MAC. What could have been another very good season for the MAC is currently being short circuit ed by the coaching meltdowns at Buffalo and BGSU along with injuries to players like Fowler.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 11/26/2015 1:42 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
Went 0-3 in tournament with one major blowout. Their best player, Chris Fowler, is out with an injury.

The past few days haven't been very good for the MAC. What could have been another very good season for the MAC is currently being short circuit ed by the coaching meltdowns at Buffalo and BGSU along with injuries to players like Fowler.
Coaching meltdowns? Details please. I'm always up for a good meltdown.
Toast
General User
Member Since: 3/11/2015
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 178
mail
Toast
mail
Posted: 11/26/2015 5:47 PM
Good news. Hopefully it will continue.

Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
Went 0-3 in tournament with one major blowout.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 11/30/2015 2:25 PM
Not seeing how that would help the MAC or Ohio.
Toast
General User
Member Since: 3/11/2015
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 178
mail
Toast
mail
Posted: 11/30/2015 2:40 PM
I wish them to lose. BINGO
Last Edited: 11/30/2015 2:44:58 PM by Toast
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 11/30/2015 11:11 PM
CMU barely squeaks by a bad team, McNeese State, 74-73, at home tonight.

I know their best player, PG Chris Fowler, is out injured, but CMU returned such a wealth of talent that I'm shaking my head at how the consensus pick to win the MAC has fallen so far so quickly.

Toast was in McGuirk tonight in McNeese gear.
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 11/30/2015 11:17 PM
I want the MAC to have solid shot at 2 team bids in NCAA - that is MUCH MORE LIKELY w/strong OOC opponent wins. Bingo busted...........
Toast
General User
Member Since: 3/11/2015
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 178
mail
Toast
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 8:34 AM
the MAC isn't going to have two teams... BINGO
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 8:52 AM
Toast wrote:expand_more
the MAC isn't going to have two teams... BINGO
Maybe but it may hurt the MAC's seeding in the tournament. Doesn't make much sense to root against the MAC OOC. Unless, of course, you've decided to recreate yourself as a troll.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,643
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 8:53 AM
Toast wrote:expand_more
I wish them to lose. BINGO
Is this one of those "Eww I hate the whole state of Michigan..." things?
Toast
General User
Member Since: 3/11/2015
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 178
mail
Toast
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 9:16 AM
Show us where the FACTS hurt you!

OUVan wrote:expand_more
the MAC isn't going to have two teams... BINGO
Maybe but it may hurt the MAC's seeding in the tournament. Doesn't make much sense to root against the MAC OOC. Unless, of course, you've decided to recreate yourself as a troll.
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 10:48 AM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
the MAC isn't going to have two teams... BINGO
Maybe but it may hurt the MAC's seeding in the tournament. Doesn't make much sense to root against the MAC OOC. Unless, of course, you've decided to recreate yourself as a troll.

Agreed. I even like to see Akron do well OOC. I don't actively root for them, as that's almost unnatural. But when they win and the RPI goes up, I like that.
bn9
General User
B9
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 422
person
mail
bn9
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 11:11 AM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
the MAC isn't going to have two teams... BINGO
Maybe but it may hurt the MAC's seeding in the tournament. Doesn't make much sense to root against the MAC OOC. Unless, of course, you've decided to recreate yourself as a troll.

Agreed. I even like to see Akron do well OOC. I don't actively root for them, as that's almost unnatural. But when they win and the RPI goes up, I like that.
I realize that I am in the minority (I usually am), but I don't root for other teams in the conference for the good of the conference. I want everyone else to be terrible. I want them humiliated at every opportunity. I have trouble rooting for someone I dislike.

It worked well for Gonzaga being in a terrible conference. If you want to increase NCAA tournament seeding, go every year and win games or beat bigger schools out of conference. It is easier to go to the dance if you are playing lesser competition. Conferences don't get seeds, teams do.

Like I said, I don't expect any of you to agree with me, but you should.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 12:02 PM
bn9 wrote:expand_more
I realize that I am in the minority (I usually am), but I don't root for other teams in the conference for the good of the conference. I want everyone else to be terrible. I want them humiliated at every opportunity. I have trouble rooting for someone I dislike.

It worked well for Gonzaga being in a terrible conference. If you want to increase NCAA tournament seeding, go every year and win games or beat bigger schools out of conference. It is easier to go to the dance if you are playing lesser competition. Conferences don't get seeds, teams do.

Like I said, I don't expect any of you to agree with me, but you should.
Gonzaga got good because they put an arse-load of money into their program and then won consistently outside the conference. And you sell the conference short. In the last 16 years they have put more than one team in the tournament 11 times including 3 on two occasions. Since 1999-2000 the MAC has had 16 tournament teams while Gonzaga's "terrible" conference has had 28. And Gonzaga's success (and the trickle down effect their RPI does) has had a lot to do with that. And while it would be nice if we could become the next Gonzaga we aren't putting enough money into the program to reach that level. We have to rely on the RPI of our opponents to give us any hope of getting an at-large. By losing these games you are so hoping the conference loses it dooms our at-large chances. Every win a team that we play gets increases our chances.
Last Edited: 12/1/2015 12:04:05 PM by OUVan
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 12:12 PM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
I realize that I am in the minority (I usually am), but I don't root for other teams in the conference for the good of the conference. I want everyone else to be terrible. I want them humiliated at every opportunity. I have trouble rooting for someone I dislike.

It worked well for Gonzaga being in a terrible conference. If you want to increase NCAA tournament seeding, go every year and win games or beat bigger schools out of conference. It is easier to go to the dance if you are playing lesser competition. Conferences don't get seeds, teams do.

Like I said, I don't expect any of you to agree with me, but you should.
Gonzaga got good because they put an arse-load of money into their program and then won consistently outside the conference. And you sell the conference short. In the last 16 years they have put more than one team in the tournament 11 times including 3 on two occasions. Since 1999-2000 the MAC has had 16 tournament teams while Gonzaga's "terrible" conference has had 28. And Gonzaga's success (and the trickle down effect their RPI does) has had a lot to do with that. And while it would be nice if we could become the next Gonzaga we aren't putting enough money into the program to reach that level. We have to rely on the RPI of our opponents to give us any hope of getting an at-large. By losing these games you are so hoping the conference loses it dooms our at-large chances. Every win a team that we play gets increases our chances.

+Bingo!! If we ever want the MAC to be a 2-bid conference, and I sure as heck hope we all do, we need to see everyone do well against better competition in November and December. CMU at 3-3 right now is not good, though much of it is due to Fowler's absence.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 12:12 PM
I completely agree with Van on this. The remarkable thing about Gonzaga is that they have dominated a very good WCC, not a terrible conference.

So often I've seen mid majors have a good SOS in the non-conference part of their schedule, only to see that slip away as they compete against conference teams below 250.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 12/1/2015 6:26 PM
Another key to the Zags early and to some effect presently, was having the balls to go on the road and win on Neutral and on the home courts of others.
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 12/2/2015 2:34 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
Another key to the Zags early and to some effect presently, was having the balls to go on the road and win on Neutral and on the home courts of others.

The "Anytime, Anywhere" approach can play dividends as long as the staff chooses those opponents wisely...i.e., not Kansas, Duke, etc. Also, I'd think it creates a bit of a mentality within the team when it works out.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 12/2/2015 5:30 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
Another key to the Zags early and to some effect presently, was having the balls to go on the road and win on Neutral and on the home courts of others.
I find it interesting that Washington and Washington State were willing to go every other year to Spokane even before Gonzaga became a name. They did a good job in getting a lot of the bigger schools on neutral sites.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 12/4/2015 3:11 PM
CMU continued their horrid preconference slate by losing to Grand Canyon last night.
yamaha45701
General User
Y45701
Member Since: 3/6/2005
Location: The plains, OH
Post Count: 173
person
mail
yamaha45701
mail
Posted: 12/4/2015 7:20 PM
They lost to Grand Canyon last night because GC has the deepest bench of any team in the country.
cathead
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 304
mail
cathead
mail
Posted: 12/5/2015 12:32 AM
;)
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 12/5/2015 9:29 AM
Keno.....killin it. new meaning to the saying. When they get their stud back are they gonna be a transformed team?
Showing Messages: 1 - 23 of 23
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)