Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Rock Bottom
Page: 1 of 2
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,128
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 2:40 PM
I honestly see only one possible guaranteed "W" left on the schedule and that's Buffalo at home. I'm guessing we can possibly beat Ball State at home. The directional Michigan's appear to have passed us and it looks like Miami's program is in better shape than ours. I see a loss in DaKalb if they have a full allotment of players which NIU didn't have in Athens.

This is rock bottom fellas and it's all on Boals.

Letting the Bahamas Ezuma mystery linger on for two effing years is a damn joke.

Recruiting HS players and putting them on scholarship and then redshirting them.

I see a lot of guys on this roster not on the 2024-2025 team. Whether it's portal transfers or Boals tells them to leave. Seems to me Boals might have to blow this whole thing up and start from scratch come April 1st.
Last Edited: 1/13/2024 2:53:23 PM by FearLeon
GraffZ06
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Dayton, OH
Post Count: 2,433
mail
GraffZ06
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 2:51 PM
Career record at Ohio after todays WMU loss.

Jeff Boals: 85-56
John Groce: 85-56

Give it a rest.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,643
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 3:02 PM
It's the trend line that's concerning, not the career record.

Groce going into his 5th year would have been returning an entire Sweet 16 team and adding an NBA player in Caris Lavert.

Boals' 5th season will be his worst of 5.
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,128
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 3:05 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
It's the trend line that's concerning, not the career record.

Groce going into his 5th year would have been returning an entire Sweet 16 team and adding an NBA player in Caris Lavert.

Boals' 5th season will be his worst of 5.
You beat me to it with this analysis of both coaches in what a year five under Groce would have looked like compared to the talent currently assembled in year five on Boals roster.
bobcat 2000
General User
B2000
Member Since: 1/22/2006
Post Count: 281
person
mail
bobcat 2000
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 3:45 PM
the question on many minds is who wins a game between this team and the 98 team?
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 4:00 PM
FearLeon wrote:expand_more
It's the trend line that's concerning, not the career record.

Groce going into his 5th year would have been returning an entire Sweet 16 team and adding an NBA player in Caris Lavert.

Boals' 5th season will be his worst of 5.
You beat me to it with this analysis of both coaches in what a year five under Groce would have looked like compared to the talent currently assembled in year five on Boals roster.
Take it a step further - Groce was 16 and 4 in his last 20 games. We are 9 and 11 in our last 20.
FJC31
General User
FJC31
Member Since: 3/31/2022
Post Count: 2,254
person
mail
FJC31
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 4:36 PM
How confident are you in Boals being able to blow it up and start from scratch, though?
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 5:30 PM
bobcat 2000 wrote:expand_more
the question on many minds is who wins a game between this team and the 98 team?
Are you getting paid by reference to the 97-98 year?
bobcatsquared
General User
B
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,844
person
mail
bobcatsquared
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 6:57 PM
Raise your hand if you had Ohio (and Kent) at 1-3 after the first two weeks of the season. With WMU at 4-0 and CMU and BG at 3-1.
BobcatSports
General User
BS
Member Since: 2/2/2006
Post Count: 1,116
person
mail
BobcatSports
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 7:42 PM
Don’t forget Boals worked wonders with Saul’s recruits. Groce pretty much started from scratch when he arrived and had spectacular recruiting classes to build his OHIO resume. Boals current roster is thin on size and talent, the results should not be surprising.
GraffZ06
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Dayton, OH
Post Count: 2,433
mail
GraffZ06
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 8:13 PM
bobcat 2000 wrote:expand_more
the question on many minds is who wins a game between this team and the 98 team?
Literally nobody but you thinks about this even though you copy and paste it into every thread.

What are you related to Chet Feldman or something?
GraffZ06
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Dayton, OH
Post Count: 2,433
mail
GraffZ06
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 8:15 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
It's the trend line that's concerning, not the career record.

Groce going into his 5th year would have been returning an entire Sweet 16 team and adding an NBA player in Caris Lavert.

Boals' 5th season will be his worst of 5.
You beat me to it with this analysis of both coaches in what a year five under Groce would have looked like compared to the talent currently assembled in year five on Boals roster.
Take it a step further - Groce was 16 and 4 in his last 20 games. We are 9 and 11 in our last 20.
Cherry picking the end of Groce's 5th year which just happened to be a Sweet 16 team vs the last set of games for Boals in an obviously down year is COMPLETELY fair.

You're right, looking at their overall bodies of work is worthless. Let's talk about the last 20 games and draw our conclusions from there.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 10:16 PM
GraffZ06 wrote:expand_more
It's the trend line that's concerning, not the career record.

Groce going into his 5th year would have been returning an entire Sweet 16 team and adding an NBA player in Caris Lavert.

Boals' 5th season will be his worst of 5.
You beat me to it with this analysis of both coaches in what a year five under Groce would have looked like compared to the talent currently assembled in year five on Boals roster.
Take it a step further - Groce was 16 and 4 in his last 20 games. We are 9 and 11 in our last 20.
Cherry picking the end of Groce's 5th year which just happened to be a Sweet 16 team vs the last set of games for Boals in an obviously down year is COMPLETELY fair.

You're right, looking at their overall bodies of work is worthless. Let's talk about the last 20 games and draw our conclusions from there.
Body of work. How about where we are today and where we "might" be going. Looking at the last 20 games gives us a pretty good indication of that. I for one hope I eat my words but these last 20 games versus Groce's last 20 plus what was coming in are as different as night and day. There was legitimate optimistic hope of continuing to win at a very high level. I sat in courtside in St. Louis and saw a missed free throw possibly cost us an elite eight birth and they were all coming back for the most part plus the stud from Pickerington who at last check, was is still playing in the NBA.
GraffZ06
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Dayton, OH
Post Count: 2,433
mail
GraffZ06
mail
Posted: 1/13/2024 11:56 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
It's the trend line that's concerning, not the career record.

Groce going into his 5th year would have been returning an entire Sweet 16 team and adding an NBA player in Caris Lavert.

Boals' 5th season will be his worst of 5.
You beat me to it with this analysis of both coaches in what a year five under Groce would have looked like compared to the talent currently assembled in year five on Boals roster.
Take it a step further - Groce was 16 and 4 in his last 20 games. We are 9 and 11 in our last 20.
Cherry picking the end of Groce's 5th year which just happened to be a Sweet 16 team vs the last set of games for Boals in an obviously down year is COMPLETELY fair.

You're right, looking at their overall bodies of work is worthless. Let's talk about the last 20 games and draw our conclusions from there.
Body of work. How about where we are today and where we "might" be going. Looking at the last 20 games gives us a pretty good indication of that. I for one hope I eat my words but these last 20 games versus Groce's last 20 plus what was coming in are as different as night and day. There was legitimate optimistic hope of continuing to win at a very high level. I sat in courtside in St. Louis and saw a missed free throw possibly cost us an elite eight birth and they were all coming back for the most part plus the stud from Pickerington who at last check, was is still playing in the NBA.
Yes, Groce had an amazing team and an amazing run. Alas, our budget didn't allow us to actually keep it or build on it and everything you said became a "could have been". But it never was. And there was no guarantee even if Groce stayed that everything would have worked out like we all hoped/thought.

Let's hope we get back there someday but the game of roster building has changed significantly since then, and not in a friendly way for Ohio.

That team was a once every 30 years type team at Ohio under previous rules. Given the landscape today it might be more like a once every 50 years type of run.

My point is, if 2012 is the measuring stick, then prepare to be let down for about 49 of the next 50 years. If it's not, then let's not use that once in a generation data point to try and make this program under Boals look worse than it is.

We suck this year. Nobody is happy about that. But statistically over the last 5 years Boals has done a tremendous job. Let's see what he can do with limited resources tying one hand behind his back in the future.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,792
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/14/2024 8:13 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
It's the trend line that's concerning, not the career record.

Groce going into his 5th year would have been returning an entire Sweet 16 team and adding an NBA player in Caris Lavert.

Boals' 5th season will be his worst of 5.
You beat me to it with this analysis of both coaches in what a year five under Groce would have looked like compared to the talent currently assembled in year five on Boals roster.
Take it a step further - Groce was 16 and 4 in his last 20 games. We are 9 and 11 in our last 20.
Cherry picking the end of Groce's 5th year which just happened to be a Sweet 16 team vs the last set of games for Boals in an obviously down year is COMPLETELY fair.

You're right, looking at their overall bodies of work is worthless. Let's talk about the last 20 games and draw our conclusions from there.
Body of work. How about where we are today and where we "might" be going. Looking at the last 20 games gives us a pretty good indication of that. I for one hope I eat my words but these last 20 games versus Groce's last 20 plus what was coming in are as different as night and day. There was legitimate optimistic hope of continuing to win at a very high level. I sat in courtside in St. Louis and saw a missed free throw possibly cost us an elite eight birth and they were all coming back for the most part plus the stud from Pickerington who at last check, was is still playing in the NBA.

And that is why we play the games, because what happened to all that "promise"?
Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,695
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 1/14/2024 9:13 AM
Oh no no no... this is not rock bottom.

Rock bottom indicates things are about to improve, you silly optimist.

Rock bottom will come March 8 when Miami finishes a season sweep.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,572
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 1/14/2024 9:56 AM
It's still only January. Teams who look poised to contend fall apart and teams who look hapless figure it out and become stronger. We could still yet find cohesion and play better. We could also flag mentally and start getting blown out instead of lose in close games.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,792
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/14/2024 8:21 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
It's still only January. Teams who look poised to contend fall apart and teams who look hapless figure it out and become stronger. We could still yet find cohesion and play better. We could also flag mentally and start getting blown out instead of lose in close games.
agreed, some act like this team is getting beat by 20 every night out. That is just not reality. Yes, wins have been tough to find, but this team has been close, despite all their issues.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,632
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 1/15/2024 8:28 AM
In the end, the only thing that matters is how does this team stack up to the 1998 team.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,632
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 1/15/2024 8:33 AM
I actually do think this is rock bottom, just in the way Pete describes not as you are saying suggesting we will get lower.

This has sucked big time this season. We've now lost EIGHT games in which we were favored. That has to be some kind of record. I think we are better than that (but still not real good) and will start to see some of these results flip in our favor. Unlikely anything special comes out of this season, but I do think in the season recal this will literally be pointed to as the rock bottom.

Take it one step at a time, next up is protecting homecourt this week and getting back to .500.
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/24/2021
Post Count: 3,656
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 1/15/2024 9:36 AM
Is it ROCK BOTTOM if we all predicted a .500 ish record?

Certainly, I'm not ready to call this rock bottom in January. We're only 1-3. Check back in March.

We're not a good team, but the talent is there. It hasn't gelled for a cornucopia of reasons, but mostly because everyone on the team is a SG.

I hate the offense. I'm sure everyone on the team hates it. I bet Boals hates it. It's just too far into the season scrap it. Even though they should.

They're bad, but despite injuries to their best players - they're still in it almost every night. If we were getting embarrassed or blown off the floor it might feel different, but they're losing by an avg 5 ppg in MAC play. We all know their weaknesses, and there are many, but just imagine we start making some FT's... could/should be 4-0. 3-1.

Rock Bottom is Buffalo. We're not quite there. The MAC is bad... we're still in the middle and will compete every night.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,792
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/15/2024 9:46 AM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
Is it ROCK BOTTOM if we all predicted a .500 ish record?

Certainly, I'm not ready to call this rock bottom in January. We're only 1-3. Check back in March.

We're not a good team, but the talent is there. It hasn't gelled for a cornucopia of reasons, but mostly because everyone on the team is a SG.

I hate the offense. I'm sure everyone on the team hates it. I bet Boals hates it. It's just too far into the season scrap it. Even though they should.

They're bad, but despite injuries to their best players - they're still in it almost every night. If we were getting embarrassed or blown off the floor it might feel different, but they're losing by an avg 5 ppg in MAC play. We all know their weaknesses, and there are many, but just imagine we start making some FT's... could/should be 4-0. 3-1.

Rock Bottom is Buffalo. We're not quite there. The MAC is bad... we're still in the middle and will compete every night.

+1
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,643
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 1/15/2024 10:31 AM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
Is it ROCK BOTTOM if we all predicted a .500 ish record?
I'm not seeing a lot of folks predicting .500 in this thread: https://bobcatattack.com/messageboard/topic.asp?FromPage=... .

The predictions are:

25-6 (NCAA tournament)
23-8 (NCAA tournament)
22-11
17-14
24-7 (NCAA tournament)
20-11 (L in MAC Championship Game)
17-14
18-13
20-11
22-9
22-9 (NCAA tournament)

That's an average record of 21-10. With 4 of 11 folks predicting a tournament visit. That's not 500ish.

This team's a big disappointment and to have a coach in his 5th year with the program unable to collect enough talent to be competitive in a very, very bad MAC is pretty inexcusable.

Boals' trendline's very concerning and I suspect it'll get worse before it gets better.
Last Edited: 1/15/2024 10:33:51 AM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/24/2021
Post Count: 3,656
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 1/15/2024 10:35 AM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Is it ROCK BOTTOM if we all predicted a .500 ish record?
I'm not seeing a lot of folks predicting .500 in this thread: https://bobcatattack.com/messageboard/topic.asp?FromPage=... .

The predictions are:

25-6 (NCAA tournament)
23-8 (NCAA tournament)
22-11
17-14
24-7 (NCAA tournament)
20-11 (L in MAC Championship Game)
17-14
18-13
20-11
22-9
22-9 (NCAA tournament)

That's an average record of 21-10. With 4 of 11 folks predicting a tournament visit. That's not 500ish.

Love my fans.


I guess I was just talking about me then.

"I just don't see us winning many games with our 2nd leading rebounder being 6'1". Basement, 16-15. Think they stay above .500 - but there will be growing pains."
Last Edited: 1/15/2024 10:37:06 AM by M.D.W.S.T
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,643
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 1/15/2024 10:41 AM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
Is it ROCK BOTTOM if we all predicted a .500 ish record?
I'm not seeing a lot of folks predicting .500 in this thread: https://bobcatattack.com/messageboard/topic.asp?FromPage=... .

The predictions are:

25-6 (NCAA tournament)
23-8 (NCAA tournament)
22-11
17-14
24-7 (NCAA tournament)
20-11 (L in MAC Championship Game)
17-14
18-13
20-11
22-9
22-9 (NCAA tournament)

That's an average record of 21-10. With 4 of 11 folks predicting a tournament visit. That's not 500ish.

Love my fans.


I guess I was just talking about me then.

"I just don't see us winning many games with our 2nd leading rebounder being 6'1". Basement, 16-15. Think they stay above .500 - but there will be growing pains."
Huge surprise that you can't tell the difference between your own opinion and what everybody else thinks.

Also, here's the first sentence of that post you quoted:

M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
20-11 seems bad... I think they at least get to 20 wins, but there is a MASSIVE hole where DW3 was last season.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 34



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)