Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Official Game 23 Thread: Ball St.
Page: 3 of 3
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 2/10/2016 1:25 PM
It was a good broadcast.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 2/10/2016 1:50 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
Agree on both of your thoughts here. The MAC should absolutley get ride of basketball divisions. I sometimes wonder if they stick with it just for scheduling reasons. Otherwise, the divisions are merely cosmetic. You get nothing for saying you're "MAC East Champs".

I thought the Ball State guys calling the game on ESPN3 were the best ones I've listened to all season in conference play. I tried to sync with Russ & Rob, but it was too big of a time gap, so I went to the TV guys.
I think keeping the divisions is entirely for scheduling because they have no other real effect. I know this isn't really practical but I would love to see us go to a true round robin 22 game schedule. Just drop four cupcakes off our OOC schedule.

I thought the announcers were good as well.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,643
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 2/10/2016 2:09 PM
Leave it to the resident O'Shea apologist to bring up the 22 game schedule.

(I actually wouldn't mind it either)
bshot44
General User
Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211
mail
bshot44
mail
Posted: 2/10/2016 2:21 PM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
Agree on both of your thoughts here. The MAC should absolutley get ride of basketball divisions. I sometimes wonder if they stick with it just for scheduling reasons. Otherwise, the divisions are merely cosmetic. You get nothing for saying you're "MAC East Champs".

I thought the Ball State guys calling the game on ESPN3 were the best ones I've listened to all season in conference play. I tried to sync with Russ & Rob, but it was too big of a time gap, so I went to the TV guys.
I think keeping the divisions is entirely for scheduling because they have no other real effect. I know this isn't really practical but I would love to see us go to a true round robin 22 game schedule. Just drop four cupcakes off our OOC schedule.

I thought the announcers were good as well.
How about instead of going 22 game MAC season (which I think is way too much)....replace the 4 cupcakes with decent OOC games. This league is stagnant on a national level. The MAC's best OOC win this year was Akron at Arkansas or Ball State over Valpo. That's it.

The league only played 15 games TOTAL against P6 leagues going 1-14
If you throw in the A-10, AAC, Colonial, MWC and MVC they went 9-28 (8-14 vs. those 5 leagues)

If this league is ever to going to get back to the level it was in the late 90s or separate themselves from the other below-average mid-major leagues (i.e. Sun Belt, OVC, Horizon) they're going to have to schedule better.

37 games vs. P6 and the second-level 5 (A-10, AAC, Colonial, MWC and MVC)
21 games vs. non-D1 (that's not counting exhibitions)

I understand every team needs a few gimmies....but that's almost 2 per school vs. non-D1.

On the flip side, it's just over 3 vs. "good" competition.

It's no wonder this league NEVER sniffs an at-large bid anymore.

Cut out a non-D1 and add an second-level 5 game.....

Akron is 20-4.....11 straight 20-win seasons....and they are NOWHERE near the at-large conversation.

Playing more MAC games isn't the answer.

Playing better OOC schedules is.

This league is pretty talented and I think has a chance to be better.....

The worst team is Miami and they lost only by 1 at Dayton and by 9 at Xavier. Rivalry game or not, that's pretty good for the worst team in the MAC.

It's time Steinbrecher holds these schools accountable for their scheduling. No more of these non-D1 games. I'd rather schedule more OVC, Sun Belt, or Horizon league teams rather than these non-D1s. Even CUSA teams (which I was stunned to see how far that league has fallen...they're bad!)

Ok...rant over.
Last Edited: 2/10/2016 2:24:15 PM by bshot44
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 2/10/2016 2:39 PM
When it comes to scheduling, I agree the league needs to have a minimum standard of OOC schedules. I wasn't in favor of the 18 game schedule, much less 22. I'd rather just see 2-3 better non-conf games as well. Conference season is great, but having 2-3 interesting opponents we don't always see, or an interesting new venue/campus to travel to is better to me.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,761
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 2/10/2016 3:37 PM
bshot, I couldn't agree more about the scheduling!

"The growth had been incremental and seen on tape by me, and now, I think the world is seeing it,” Ohio coach Saul Phillips said.

I wonder what they're saying about us in Istanbul?
GroverBall
General User
GB
Member Since: 12/3/2012
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 1,294
person
mail
GroverBall
mail
Posted: 2/10/2016 3:58 PM
BOB&BEARCAT wrote:expand_more
I was sitting with my Friend Paul Baron during the game some Ball State chump got mouthy with him at the end of the game. Paul put him in his place and he shut up. What do you expect Hoosier versus a New Yorker no contest. LOL Any one at the game here this.
Only "heard" it thru Borna who mentioned it in the chat, I was curious about the details.
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
General User
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 1,926
mail
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
mail
Posted: 2/10/2016 4:01 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
The league only played 15 games TOTAL against P6 leagues going 1-14
If you throw in the A-10, AAC, Colonial, MWC and MVC they went 9-28 (8-14 vs. those 5 leagues)

If this league is ever to going to get back to the level it was in the late 90s or separate themselves from the other below-average mid-major leagues (i.e. Sun Belt, OVC, Horizon) they're going to have to schedule better.

37 games vs. P6 and the second-level 5 (A-10, AAC, Colonial, MWC and MVC)
21 games vs. non-D1 (that's not counting exhibitions)


Ok...rant over.
I would like to schedule better games as much as anyone, but doesn't the fact that the MAC went 1-14 against P6 prove that we shouldn't be scheduling more of those games? None of the teams are good enough to win them and the conference actually benefits from everyone having cupcake schedules and padding their records. That's why we are the 10th rated conference in RPI and 12th according to kenpom.com. Our conference RPI is higher than the Mountain West, Summit, MVC, WCC, Ivy, Horizon, Sun Belt, and Conf-USA. Going back just three years we were 18th as a conference in RPI.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 2/11/2016 10:04 AM
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead wrote:expand_more
I would like to schedule better games as much as anyone, but doesn't the fact that the MAC went 1-14 against P6 prove that we shouldn't be scheduling more of those games? None of the teams are good enough to win them and the conference actually benefits from everyone having cupcake schedules and padding their records. That's why we are the 10th rated conference in RPI and 12th according to kenpom.com. Our conference RPI is higher than the Mountain West, Summit, MVC, WCC, Ivy, Horizon, Sun Belt, and Conf-USA. Going back just three years we were 18th as a conference in RPI.
How many of those P6 games were in MAC arenas? I'm all for scheduling tougher games as long as they are fair. Play the P6 teams in neutral settings if they won't agree to come to Athens. If they won't come to Athens then screw them.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,761
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 2/11/2016 3:04 PM
We are not in a position of power to dictate scheduling P6 schools in Athens. It benefits us to play them on the road even if we lose more than we win. If you want to improve and elevate the program you must play those games on the road. Maybe down the road you get some back. Oh by the way: It's not fair and never will be fair.
Last Edited: 2/11/2016 3:05:14 PM by giacomo
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 2/11/2016 3:29 PM
Anyone have rough idea of the financial aspects (revenues, costs) of playing a bigtime school on the road or Convo, smallertime on road or Convo?

I'm okay with us doing whatever it takes to build a consistently solid team.

Make us a 'name' known (winning) team and much should follow.


The beast is TV and media. Be tasty for TV and much follows.


Generally, TV and media seem to like the OHIO.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 2/11/2016 4:26 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
We are not in a position of power to dictate scheduling P6 schools in Athens. It benefits us to play them on the road even if we lose more than we win. If you want to improve and elevate the program you must play those games on the road. Maybe down the road you get some back. Oh by the way: It's not fair and never will be fair.
Also keep in mind a "home game" in December does not mean the students are in session (thus also impacting size of crowd and financials per Monroe's inquiry above). Per another thread - go on the road, play anyone anywhere, anytime. This does not mean every game needs to be against the Oklahomas. Play some Minnys, PSU, Rutgers, Miss. St. etc.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,761
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 2/11/2016 5:35 PM
Ed Zachary
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 2/11/2016 5:41 PM
cc-cat wrote:expand_more
We are not in a position of power to dictate scheduling P6 schools in Athens. It benefits us to play them on the road even if we lose more than we win. If you want to improve and elevate the program you must play those games on the road. Maybe down the road you get some back. Oh by the way: It's not fair and never will be fair.
Also keep in mind a "home game" in December does not mean the students are in session (thus also impacting size of crowd and financials per Monroe's inquiry above). Per another thread - go on the road, play anyone anywhere, anytime. This does not mean every game needs to be against the Oklahomas. Play some Minnys, PSU, Rutgers, Miss. St. etc.
I'll take the schedule that former OU assistant and current Yale head coach James Jones has year in and year out. Here is this year's schedule:

http://www.yalebulldogs.com/sports/m-baskbl/2015-16/schedule
LuckySparrow
General User
Member Since: 10/16/2012
Location: IL
Post Count: 1,814
mail
LuckySparrow
mail
Posted: 2/11/2016 5:48 PM
I hope we keep scheduling those non-con tournaments. Those seem like a way to get some solid opponents on the schedule on a neutral court.

Also, I would kill for some sort of MVC/MAC Challenge. There are plenty of high quality mid-majors to schedule.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 2/11/2016 10:27 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
We are not in a position of power to dictate scheduling P6 schools in Athens. It benefits us to play them on the road even if we lose more than we win. If you want to improve and elevate the program you must play those games on the road. Maybe down the road you get some back. Oh by the way: It's not fair and never will be fair.
Interesting take

closest to that idea is Gonzaga and Butler. Going back through their schedules since 2002 it looks like, even though in Spokane they have the new Kennel they tend to get P6 teams on the road and nuetral places other than the Kennel or Hinkle making use of Banker's Life or Key Arenas.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 2/12/2016 11:29 AM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
We are not in a position of power to dictate scheduling P6 schools in Athens. It benefits us to play them on the road even if we lose more than we win. If you want to improve and elevate the program you must play those games on the road. Maybe down the road you get some back. Oh by the way: It's not fair and never will be fair.
Are you a lobbyist for the P6? It doesn't benefit us at all if we lose. It's a huge benefit if you win but just check the record and see what the MAC's record is in P6 gyms. I would 100 times out of 100 take a home and home against a good MVC team over a one-and-done road game against a P6. The key is getting to the point that you are consistently good enough that you won't be seen as a bad loss (i.e. Gonzaga, Wichita State). Would love to see us get to the point that we can schedule like Wichita State. They played 5 games against the big boys with 1 road game, 3 neutrals and 1 home. They also played tough mids home and away. Gonzaga played a similar schedule although they got several P6 home games. But I think it is extremely stupid to play the P6 by their rules. Screw them.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,761
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 2/12/2016 4:41 PM
Getting home and home games against the MVC is not going to happen or it would have by now. You are already penciling losses before the games are played. Look at Milwaukee this year. They played at Minnesota and at Wisconsin. They won both games because they are good this year. They played Wisconsin last year and got drilled. If you don't go on the road you're stuck in the one bid limbo and must win the conference tourney. It's okay if that's what we want as a program, but don't expect more doing the same old things. That's why they play the games. Sometimes you win.
Showing Messages: 51 - 68 of 68
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)