Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Olympic hoops
Page: 1 of 3
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 8/9/2016 3:12 AM
I'm sure this will be a minority o-pinion but I have absolutely no interest.

Seeing the U.S. slaughter everyone--what's the point?

I'd rather we take a team of guys 23 and under (something like that) and see how we do that way.

These aren't even games the way it is. We're so much better that these are exhibitions at best.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 8/9/2016 8:23 AM
Their two games so far have been against China and Venezuela, two of the lesser teams in the tournament. We will see if the blowouts continue against better competition.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,610
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 8/9/2016 8:25 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Seeing the U.S. slaughter everyone--what's the point?

Reminding the world that socialism is inferior.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,683
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 8/9/2016 12:09 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I'm sure this will be a minority o-pinion but I have absolutely no interest.

Seeing the U.S. slaughter everyone--what's the point?

I'd rather we take a team of guys 23 and under (something like that) and see how we do that way.

These aren't even games the way it is. We're so much better that these are exhibitions at best.
+1

I lost all interest in Olympic basketball when they let professionals play.
BobcatSports
General User
BS
Member Since: 2/2/2006
Post Count: 1,116
person
mail
BobcatSports
mail
Posted: 8/9/2016 2:13 PM
Agree wholeheartedly OCF. If they were playing in my backyard I would pull the shades.
bobcat2nc
General User
B2
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Post Count: 584
person
mail
bobcat2nc
mail
Posted: 8/9/2016 4:29 PM
There's still basketball in the Olympics???
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 8/9/2016 6:21 PM
There's still Olympics?
OUs LONG Driver
General User
OLD
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Copley, OH
Post Count: 707
person
mail
OUs LONG Driver
mail
Posted: 8/9/2016 6:38 PM
I agree it's not real fun to watch in the early stages, but isn't the goal of the Olympics to win a gold medal and be the best in the world at a particular sport? Running out some college guys who play closer games and ultimately lose wouldn't be any more enjoyable to me and runs counter to the whole goal of the games. Best vs Best for every country in every sport fielded.

I'm sure there are other events where other countries are dominant like we are in basketball and they win every year by a landslide and take great pride in doing so.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 8/10/2016 11:16 PM
Australia came close to defeating USA today. Game was in doubt until about the 1:00 mark. Really outstanding performance by the Aussies, who have five NBA players.

I disagree with the rest of ya. I like the professionals being involved. Many NBA players are on teams other than USA.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 8/10/2016 11:58 PM
Still boring.

Unlike probably most of you, I've had enough of waltzing to the gold victories.

I'd rather see good competition, win or lose, that the U.S. just blowing away lesser opponents.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 8/11/2016 12:14 AM
That's my point...USA did not blow away this opponent.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 8/11/2016 9:30 AM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
That's my point...USA did not blow away this opponent.
Agreed Jeff-that was a very entertaining game to watch-Australia with a 54-49 lead at halftime with several beautiful back-door cuts against the US's defense.

Hey look at it this way-what else was there better to do yesterday from 6-8 pm?

Along those lines, I loved the way the game lasted less than 2 hours. Loved the 10 minute quarters and lack of commercial interruptions.
Last Edited: 8/11/2016 9:31:03 AM by Mark Lembright '85
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 8/11/2016 1:53 PM
Obviously, there are teams that challenge the USA. Although America is the obvious favorite, a gold medal is not a foregone conclusion like it was in 1992 and 1996. Argentina won the gold in 2004.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 8/11/2016 6:36 PM
Disagree. No way we lose the goldie. If we play Aussie again, it'll be substantial.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 8/11/2016 7:04 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Disagree. No way we lose the goldie. If we play Aussie again, it'll be substantial.
Kylie Irving once had the option of playing for Australia but I guess he declined it. Imagine if he had accepted and were on this Australian team! Maybe Australia doesn't win the Gold but they sure would have won last night.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,652
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 8/11/2016 7:41 PM
I think it actually feels like the US is a bit further ahead of the rest of the world right now than they actually are.

Several of the traditional challengers -- Spain, Argentina, Greece, Lithuania -- just happen to be in down cycles at the moment. Additionally, there are other countries, notable Canada and Australia, that are set to get much better in coming international tournaments. The Australian team that played yesterday will be adding Ben Simmons, Dante Exum, and Thon Maker in the next cycle. Canada will have a core of Karl Anthony Towns, Andrew Wiggins, Tristan Thompson, and Trey Lyles in the near future.
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,662
person
mail
rpbobcat
mail
Posted: 8/12/2016 6:31 AM
I've only watched snippets of some games,but,from the layout of the court and refs' calls, it looks like the Olympic game is getting more and more similar to how the game is played in the U.S.

If only they would do that in wrestling.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,123
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 8/12/2016 8:36 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I'm sure this will be a minority o-pinion but I have absolutely no interest.

Seeing the U.S. slaughter everyone--what's the point?

I'd rather we take a team of guys 23 and under (something like that) and see how we do that way.

These aren't even games the way it is. We're so much better that these are exhibitions at best.

Football (with its under 23 rule -- with 3 age exceptions) has been fairly entertaining. After this year I wouldn't mind seeing the same applied to basketball.


The Optimist wrote:expand_more
Seeing the U.S. slaughter everyone--what's the point?

Reminding the world that socialism is inferior.
Uh, the US is a socialist country. (Ooops, I started a thread on politics.)
Buckeye to Bobcat
General User
BB
Member Since: 9/10/2013
Post Count: 1,873
person
mail
Buckeye to Bobcat
mail
Posted: 8/12/2016 11:43 AM
I would say give Canada ten years. I think they can be just as big of a load in Olympic play once Wiggins and Co. come into their own.
GroverBall
General User
GB
Member Since: 12/3/2012
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 1,294
person
mail
GroverBall
mail
Posted: 8/12/2016 11:26 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Disagree. No way we lose the goldie. If we play Aussie again, it'll be substantial.
ya know, for a guy who has "absolutely no interest" . . .
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 8/13/2016 1:09 AM
USA 94, Serbia 91. Another "boring" blowout.
Big Willy
General User
BW
Member Since: 12/29/2004
Post Count: 197
person
mail
Big Willy
mail
Posted: 8/13/2016 7:40 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
USA 94, Serbia 91. Another "boring" blowout.
Right. I'm getting tired of these 10 point and 3 point blowouts.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 8/14/2016 3:46 PM
More yawnnn time. 100-97 over France with France resting it's best player.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 8/15/2016 7:57 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I'm sure this will be a minority o-pinion but I have absolutely no interest.

Seeing the U.S. slaughter everyone--what's the point?

I'd rather we take a team of guys 23 and under (something like that) and see how we do that way.

These aren't even games the way it is. We're so much better that these are exhibitions at best.
I think we can put this nonsense to bed now. It's pretty obvious that we're not talking about the first Dream Team versus the little sisters of the poor any more. Basketball is a big time international sport more and more now.

You can argue about the pros playing in the Olympics, but it is what it is. Enjoy the new reality.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,610
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 8/15/2016 8:20 AM
Buckeye to Bobcat wrote:expand_more
I would say give Canada ten years. I think they can be just as big of a load in Olympic play once Wiggins and Co. come into their own.

Ha! Canada!

10 years from now Lebron James Jr will be 21 years old. I envision a 41 y/o Lebron James making a movie-esque return to team up with his son to defeat alien-invaders from the north.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 57
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)