Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Official Game 7 Thread: Iona
Page: 3 of 3
mail
OhioStunter
12/10/2016 11:41 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
Reading these posts, I don't know whether to laugh, shake my head, or what. Yes, there was some "really poor stuff" (quoting my own analysis I sent to a friend) late in the game that cost us the game, and I was mad about some things. But I'd never draw the conclusions that some of y'all are drawing.

I wonder what some of you guys were thinking back in 2012, our Sweet 16 year. Right in the middle of our MAC season, we had two consecutive losses where we looked like a 300 plus RPI team...I was present for both of them...First, a loss to a mediocre Toledo team after getting off to a 15-0 lead. Then, A Few Days later, we go to EMU. We don't even SCORE until the 900 mark of the first half, and we lose handily.
I figure some of you were ready to give up on that bunch.
Agreed. There are a lot of strong descriptors in this thread for a 5-2 team.

Reminder: It is December 10.
mail
person
allen
12/11/2016 12:08 AM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
Reading these posts, I don't know whether to laugh, shake my head, or what. Yes, there was some "really poor stuff" (quoting my own analysis I sent to a friend) late in the game that cost us the game, and I was mad about some things. But I'd never draw the conclusions that some of y'all are drawing.

I wonder what some of you guys were thinking back in 2012, our Sweet 16 year. Right in the middle of our MAC season, we had two consecutive losses where we looked like a 300 plus RPI team...I was present for both of them...First, a loss to a mediocre Toledo team after getting off to a 15-0 lead. Then, A Few Days later, we go to EMU. We don't even SCORE until the 900 mark of the first half, and we lose handily.
I figure some of you were ready to give up on that bunch.
Agreed. There are a lot of strong descriptors in this thread for a 5-2 team.

Reminder: It is December 10.

It is December 10th and any chance of an at large bid is out of the window, After returning and All-MAC PG and the MAC Player of the year and a top MAC Newcomer. The seson is nowhere near over, but some doors have already closed and it is only December 11th.
mail
person
Chicken George
12/11/2016 12:53 AM
Man, oh man--that's as frustrated as I've been in a long time watching an OHIO hoops game. My take is that when the going's good with what I call these kinds of John Beilien type team and the it's all clicking--they're fun to watch and life is good. When it's not clicking, this finesse type of ball, with niche players, can drive you crazy in that you feel so limited. Negative thoughts start running through your mind like:

*When you've got more than a couple guys who struggle to stop penetration, aren't particularly athletic and when you have a guy like Carter playing the 5 for large stretches of the game--wouldn't it be nice to be able to mix up defenses periodically? Don't teams like ours typically have a frustrating zone they throw at people from time-to-time, or at least something that doesn't expose your inability to match-up man-per-man well?
*I wish we were more athletic at the #3 spot.
*I wish our #4 played more like his true 6'8" frame and not like he was 6'2" and relegated to shooting bombs, which I thought when he was coming in he'd be more reliable at doing. We're very limited at the #3 and very one dimensional at the #4.
*That when you have a team recruiting high IQ guys who could shoot, that would equate to being able to shoot FTs. Will be interesting to see how we hold up in those mid-week wrestling matches in MAC play when tough, scrappy and often ugly games in front of small crowds are the norm.
*When your star is your #5, that if the other team has a stud #5 you wouldn't lose that position battle as you're soft in the middle because your #4 doesn't like the inside game and your #5 wants to join the rest of the team in preferring the perimeter.

When all cylinders are clicking with this style of team, it will be tons of fun. If they get hot late like JG teams, a magical ride is possible. However mixed in will be nights when it's not clicking, you're one dimensional and you get kicked in the teeth when during crunch time down the stretch when the long rangers aren't going in and you've got nothing else to go to. When you need a tough buck the last couple minutes, where do we go to other than another long range attempt? Lots of season to go, but that was a tough L.
Last Edited: 12/11/2016 10:22:24 AM by Chicken George
mail
person
Bobcat1998
12/11/2016 7:54 AM
Chicken George wrote:expand_more
Man, oh man--that's as frustrated as I've been in a long time watching an OHIO hoops game. My take is that when the going's good with what I call these kinds of John Beilien type team and the it's all clicking--their fun to watch and life is good. When it's not clicking, this finesse type of ball with niche players can drive you crazy. Negative thoughts start running through your mind like:

*When you've got more than a couple guys who struggle to stop penetration, aren't particularly athletic and when you have a guy like Carter playing the 5 for large stretches of the game--wouldn't it be nice to be able to mix up defenses periodically? Don't teams like ours typically have a frustrating zone they throw at people from time-to-time, or at least something that doesn't expose your inability to match-up man-per-man well?
*I wish we were more athletic at the #3 spot.
*I wish our #4 played more like his true 6'8" frame and not like he was 6'2" and relegated to shooting bombs, which I thought when he was coming in he'd be more reliable at doing. We're very limited at the #3 and very one dimensional at the #4.
*That when you have a team recruiting high IQ guys who could shoot, that would equate to being able to shoot FTs. Will be interesting to see how we hold up in those mid-week wrestling matches in MAC play when tough, scrappy and often ugly games in front of small crowds are the norm.
*When you're star is your #5, that if the other team has a stud #5 you lose that position battle as you're soft in the middle because your #4 doesn't like the inside game and your #5 wants to join the rest of the team in preferring the perimeter.

When all cylinders are clicking with this style of team, it will be tons of fun. If they get hot late like JG teams, a magical ride is possible. However mixed in will be nights when it's not clicking, you're one dimensional and you get kicked in the teeth when during crunch time down the stretch the long rangers aren't going in and you've got nothing else to go to. Lots of season to go, but that was a tough L.
I thought KK was going to come in and work on his versatility. How can you be a solid 6-8 and hate going inside?
mail
person
Bobcat1998
12/11/2016 7:57 AM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
Reading these posts, I don't know whether to laugh, shake my head, or what. Yes, there was some "really poor stuff" (quoting my own analysis I sent to a friend) late in the game that cost us the game, and I was mad about some things. But I'd never draw the conclusions that some of y'all are drawing.

I wonder what some of you guys were thinking back in 2012, our Sweet 16 year. Right in the middle of our MAC season, we had two consecutive losses where we looked like a 300 plus RPI team...I was present for both of them...First, a loss to a mediocre Toledo team after getting off to a 15-0 lead. Then, A Few Days later, we go to EMU. We don't even SCORE until the 900 mark of the first half, and we lose handily.
I figure some of you were ready to give up on that bunch.
People are stating that this team can get hot but what is troubling is how soft we were in 2 losses to teams who are very similar to mac teams
mail
person
giacomo
12/11/2016 3:27 PM
Jeff, I completely agree with your post. Some of these posts are simply "nattering nabobs of negativism."
mail
person
Jeff McKinney
12/11/2016 3:45 PM
Speak on, Spiro!
mail
100%Cat
12/12/2016 7:49 AM
Back away from the ledge. Back away from the ledge.

It's a road non-conf game in December. As much as some like to think, it does not matter. The only way we get to the dance is winning in Cleveland. If we stumble a little on the road early and learn from mistakes and failures that pay off in Cleveland, I'm perfectly fine with that.
mail
100%Cat
12/12/2016 10:07 AM
Since we can't get any visual highlights from losses on Bobcat TV, if you want to see any of the action you need to give Iona's page some traffic instead of our own:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=met_6TtpRyQ

Not that I'm still salty about no Bobcat TV videos after losses or anything...
mail
person
bobcatsquared
12/12/2016 11:45 AM
100%Cat wrote:expand_more
It's a road non-conf game in December. As much as some like to think, it does not matter. The only way we get to the dance is winning in Cleveland. If we stumble a little on the road early and learn from mistakes and failures that pay off in Cleveland, I'm perfectly fine with that.
We hear this every pre-conference season and I couldn't disagree more. Every game matters, from November through March. Otherwise, don't play them.

I do agree that the players/coaches can learn from losses, maybe more than from wins. But if Ohio is as good as some on here think they are, or at least hope they are, then the Cats should be winning games at Iona and Marshall.
mail
OU_Country
12/12/2016 12:02 PM
allen wrote:expand_more
Sam Cassell Jr., wow, how did they get him?
Grad transfer from UConn.
mail
100%Cat
12/12/2016 12:15 PM
bobcatsquared wrote:expand_more
It's a road non-conf game in December. As much as some like to think, it does not matter. The only way we get to the dance is winning in Cleveland. If we stumble a little on the road early and learn from mistakes and failures that pay off in Cleveland, I'm perfectly fine with that.
We hear this every pre-conference season and I couldn't disagree more. Every game matters, from November through March. Otherwise, don't play them.

I do agree that the players/coaches can learn from losses, maybe more than from wins. But if Ohio is as good as some on here think they are, or at least hope they are, then the Cats should be winning games at Iona and Marshall.
Had we beaten Iona and/or Marshall, we still would need to win in Cleveland to make the tournament. That's the bottom line. So, how consequential are they, really?

And keep in mind, our darling Sweet 16 team lost 5 conference road games. The world is not ending.
mail
person
Recovering Journalist
12/12/2016 12:23 PM
Bobcat1998 wrote:expand_more
Reading these posts, I don't know whether to laugh, shake my head, or what. Yes, there was some "really poor stuff" (quoting my own analysis I sent to a friend) late in the game that cost us the game, and I was mad about some things. But I'd never draw the conclusions that some of y'all are drawing.

I wonder what some of you guys were thinking back in 2012, our Sweet 16 year. Right in the middle of our MAC season, we had two consecutive losses where we looked like a 300 plus RPI team...I was present for both of them...First, a loss to a mediocre Toledo team after getting off to a 15-0 lead. Then, A Few Days later, we go to EMU. We don't even SCORE until the 900 mark of the first half, and we lose handily.
I figure some of you were ready to give up on that bunch.
People are stating that this team can get hot but what is troubling is how soft we were in 2 losses to teams who are very similar to mac teams
I was pretty surly in the chat room, and that's why I like to wait a while to post. I don't think the "negative" people are throwing the season away or anything. I think it's more disappointment at blowing a road lead to a good but beatable team, and having some fundamental weaknesses exposed again. I had higher hopes for the team at this point. Right now, this looks like a TOS "life on the road" team that goes 11-7 in conference and could beat Akron one night and lose to Miami the next game. I was hoping for much better. That doesn't mean I'm writing the season off or that things can't change.
mail
OU_Country
12/12/2016 12:23 PM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
Reading these posts, I don't know whether to laugh, shake my head, or what. Yes, there was some "really poor stuff" (quoting my own analysis I sent to a friend) late in the game that cost us the game, and I was mad about some things. But I'd never draw the conclusions that some of y'all are drawing.

I wonder what some of you guys were thinking back in 2012, our Sweet 16 year. Right in the middle of our MAC season, we had two consecutive losses where we looked like a 300 plus RPI team...I was present for both of them...First, a loss to a mediocre Toledo team after getting off to a 15-0 lead. Then, A Few Days later, we go to EMU. We don't even SCORE until the 900 mark of the first half, and we lose handily.
I figure some of you were ready to give up on that bunch.
Agreed. There are a lot of strong descriptors in this thread for a 5-2 team.

Reminder: It is December 10.
Absolutely. Based on most of the rants in this thread, you'd think the Cats went to Iona and lost by 25. I obviously watched I different game. The game that I saw definitely left something to be desired at the end, but to say this team was "poor" simply isn't the case.

There appear to be some old issues on defense sometimes, and the free throw shooting, which will get better, was a factor in this one. The one that seemed odd to me was how they seemed to get away from running offense in the scoreless stretch. I'm not great at analyzing things like that during a game, so I didn't note what Iona might have done to affect them. Running the offense and working for good shots is something that seems to be a strength of this team, so it was odd to me they had that drought.

In my opinion, this one came down to a few decisions that didn't go well at the end. Coach leaving Tony out for that crucial stretch, and Simmons forcing the long pass under a minute in a one possession game that ended up causing a turnover. If that pass connects, Tony gets a dunk, and all the negative posts aren't here.
Last Edited: 12/12/2016 12:24:27 PM by OU_Country
mail
OU_Country
12/12/2016 12:27 PM
Recovering Journalist wrote:expand_more
I was pretty surly in the chat room, and that's why I like to wait a while to post. I don't think the "negative" people are throwing the season away or anything. I think it's more disappointment at blowing a road lead to a good but beatable team, and having some fundamental weaknesses exposed again. I had higher hopes for the team at this point. Right now, this looks like a TOS "life on the road" team that goes 11-7 in conference and could beat Akron one night and lose to Miami the next game. I was hoping for much better. That doesn't mean I'm writing the season off or that things can't change.

"...having some fundamental weaknesses exposed again."

As it relates to the defensive end, this is the biggest concern to me.
mail
bshot44
12/12/2016 1:46 PM
A lot has been made about Saul keeping AC on the bench during a crucial stretch. I actually don't blame him at all for jerking Campbell out.

Go back and watch the second half

AC was relatively ineffective...spent most of the time whining to refs about not getting any calls in the post.

He was 2-7 FGs....his last bucket with 8:52 left. Was 0-2 FTs. Had two turnovers....and five rebounds.....but only two in the final 10 mins (both defensive)

He missed a layup that resulted in him getting frustrated and making a terrible, lazy foul on the rebound for his 4th foul. That's when Saul pulled him. Came with 4:28 to go.

Saul kept him on the bench for a whole 1:38......where Iona outscored Ohio 2-0.....and Iona had two offensive possessions and Ohio had one.

I wouldn't exactly fault Saul for that decision. And I definitely wouldn't say it really cost Ohio the game. This game was lost more when AC was on the court, rather than when he was off it.

This is supposed to be the MAC player of the year....a potential NBAer.....the star of Ohio basketball.

Jordan Washington was the star that was the court for this one....including 13-18 shooting for 30 points.

Those are the type of numbers you'd expect from your star.

I'm guessing from Saul's postgame comments...

"I'm more disappointed in how we lost. I'm mad. I'm flat-out mad."

"I don't expect that out of a veteran group."

...that he probably is pretty disappointed with how his star performed with the game on the line.

I'm not saying the season is lost...or that Ohio is terrible. But that game was very disappointing and doesn't provide a lot of hope that this team is ready to compete when things get tough. There were a lot of mistakes highlighted in many of the above posts that need to be corrected if this team is going to win the MAC (and even think about competing on an NCAA Tourney level)

I think everyone had high hopes for this team....but maybe they just won't live up to the pre-season hype. So far it appears to be headed that way.

For all the talent on this team....stuff like Saturday should not be happening.

I agree nobody should be jumping off a bridge just yet. But after Marshall and Iona...there is plenty of reason for concern and questioning just really how good this team is.
Last Edited: 12/12/2016 1:47:30 PM by bshot44
mail
RSBobcat
12/12/2016 11:32 PM
The game was lost in the paint.

Jeesh - I feel like I'm turning into a Monroe on the Bball board.....

We lost the game - In The Paint. And for the season this year so far this is a TREND. W's and L's.
mail
GraffZ06
12/13/2016 12:03 AM
Recovering Journalist wrote:expand_more
I had higher hopes for the team at this point. Right now, this looks like a TOS "life on the road" team that goes 11-7 in conference and could beat Akron one night and lose to Miami the next game. I was hoping for much better. That doesn't mean I'm writing the season off or that things can't change.
This. QFT.
mail
OhioStunter
12/13/2016 1:13 AM
allen wrote:expand_more
Reading these posts, I don't know whether to laugh, shake my head, or what. Yes, there was some "really poor stuff" (quoting my own analysis I sent to a friend) late in the game that cost us the game, and I was mad about some things. But I'd never draw the conclusions that some of y'all are drawing.

I wonder what some of you guys were thinking back in 2012, our Sweet 16 year. Right in the middle of our MAC season, we had two consecutive losses where we looked like a 300 plus RPI team...I was present for both of them...First, a loss to a mediocre Toledo team after getting off to a 15-0 lead. Then, A Few Days later, we go to EMU. We don't even SCORE until the 900 mark of the first half, and we lose handily.
I figure some of you were ready to give up on that bunch.
Agreed. There are a lot of strong descriptors in this thread for a 5-2 team.

Reminder: It is December 10.

It is December 10th and any chance of an at large bid is out of the window, After returning and All-MAC PG and the MAC Player of the year and a top MAC Newcomer. The seson is nowhere near over, but some doors have already closed and it is only December 11th.
Do you really think a MAC team has a chance at an at-large? It hasn't happened since 1999 and it likely wouldn't have happened with Ohio. Even with a win over Iona. What's the signature win? Georgia Tech?

Remember when we had Trent and won the Pre-Season NIT, were ranked #14, played Kentucky and Xavier and still didn't make at at-large?

Win the MAC Tourney!
mail
person
bobcatsquared
12/13/2016 6:37 AM
Marshall scores 56 points in the second half v. Ohio. Iona scores 45 second-half points v. Ohio.

Players and coaches have been preaching how much work and focus they've put into improving the defense but we're still seeing some of the same troubles that plagued the team last season. Can't allow that and expect to win against average teams, home or away. This team will go as far as its defense will take it this year.
mail
person
allen
12/13/2016 2:34 PM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
Reading these posts, I don't know whether to laugh, shake my head, or what. Yes, there was some "really poor stuff" (quoting my own analysis I sent to a friend) late in the game that cost us the game, and I was mad about some things. But I'd never draw the conclusions that some of y'all are drawing.

I wonder what some of you guys were thinking back in 2012, our Sweet 16 year. Right in the middle of our MAC season, we had two consecutive losses where we looked like a 300 plus RPI team...I was present for both of them...First, a loss to a mediocre Toledo team after getting off to a 15-0 lead. Then, A Few Days later, we go to EMU. We don't even SCORE until the 900 mark of the first half, and we lose handily.
I figure some of you were ready to give up on that bunch.
Agreed. There are a lot of strong descriptors in this thread for a 5-2 team.

Reminder: It is December 10.

It is December 10th and any chance of an at large bid is out of the window, After returning and All-MAC PG and the MAC Player of the year and a top MAC Newcomer. The seson is nowhere near over, but some doors have already closed and it is only December 11th.
Do you really think a MAC team has a chance at an at-large? It hasn't happened since 1999 and it likely wouldn't have happened with Ohio. Even with a win over Iona. What's the signature win? Georgia Tech?

Remember when we had Trent and won the Pre-Season NIT, were ranked #14, played Kentucky and Xavier and still didn't make at at-large?

Win the MAC Tourney!
We were getting votes for the top 25 and if we ate all the cupcakes that we were supposed to eat, we would have been ranked going into our conference schedule, with a high RPI and then we could have afforded some blips, but no, we go on the road and lose twice and give Saul a raise and eat our mediocre cookies. You can just show up and expect win, you have to execute. The coach needs to get more out of this team or we will be in the CBI again. TOS to GT. JC to DePaul. Who cares? What is our coach doing? Lets go Cats
Last Edited: 12/13/2016 10:38:45 PM by allen
mail
OU_Country
12/14/2016 10:10 AM
allen wrote:expand_more
Reading these posts, I don't know whether to laugh, shake my head, or what. Yes, there was some "really poor stuff" (quoting my own analysis I sent to a friend) late in the game that cost us the game, and I was mad about some things. But I'd never draw the conclusions that some of y'all are drawing.

I wonder what some of you guys were thinking back in 2012, our Sweet 16 year. Right in the middle of our MAC season, we had two consecutive losses where we looked like a 300 plus RPI team...I was present for both of them...First, a loss to a mediocre Toledo team after getting off to a 15-0 lead. Then, A Few Days later, we go to EMU. We don't even SCORE until the 900 mark of the first half, and we lose handily.
I figure some of you were ready to give up on that bunch.
Agreed. There are a lot of strong descriptors in this thread for a 5-2 team.

Reminder: It is December 10.

It is December 10th and any chance of an at large bid is out of the window, After returning and All-MAC PG and the MAC Player of the year and a top MAC Newcomer. The seson is nowhere near over, but some doors have already closed and it is only December 11th.
Do you really think a MAC team has a chance at an at-large? It hasn't happened since 1999 and it likely wouldn't have happened with Ohio. Even with a win over Iona. What's the signature win? Georgia Tech?

Remember when we had Trent and won the Pre-Season NIT, were ranked #14, played Kentucky and Xavier and still didn't make at at-large?

Win the MAC Tourney!
We were getting votes for the top 25 and if we ate all the cupcakes that we were supposed to eat, we would have been ranked going into our conference schedule, with a high RPI and then we could have afforded some blips, but no, we go on the road and lose twice and give Saul a raise and eat our mediocre cookies. You can just show up and expect win, you have to execute. The coach needs to get more out of this team or we will be in the CBI again. TOS to GT. JC to DePaul. Who cares? What is our coach doing? Lets go Cats
Woulda, coulda, shoulda....on to tonight's game, and then to Saturday.
Showing Messages: 51 - 72 of 72
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)