Every March while watching NCAA tourney games, this thought comes to mind: If during the regular season the Power conf schools played a half dozen non-Power schools on neutral courts, come March how powerful would they appear?
I'm not referring only to tourney games in which Round 1 lower seeds top higher seeds. I am also referring to close losses such as Princeton's 2-pt loss to ND.
Put otherwise, I tend to believe that the gap between Power and Non-Power teams isn't as cavernous as the power and schedule strength rankings suggest.
And to beat a dead horse (does not apply to the Ivy League) when you look at the FGCU's and ETSU's and see rosters dominated by transfers, that has everything to do with it. They end up with bunch of older and more experienced guys, some of whom have been through the d-1 and even P5 wars. And then they fill in even more with juco guys. Put it in the blender and pour out an instant veteran team. Kent had 7 transfers total between juco and 4 years schools.