Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Keeping up with... Miami?
Page: 2 of 2
mail
person
NewAthenian
4/18/2017 8:59 AM
BuddyLee wrote:expand_more
I don't see how anone can be against Sook which is providing ACADEMIC help to our athletes. Even the people who hate athletics.
Disclaimer: The following opinions are not necessarily mine, and I may fail to reproduce them accurately. However, it is my understanding that the opposition from Sook comes from two avenues. (Other than "We just hate athletics")

One is the idea that creating an academic space only for athletes sets them apart from other students, and this is an undesirable outcome for a university body. I am agnostic on this point, and so have little more to say about it.

The other is of course the money. Some feel that so many other facilities on campus are in a sorry state of disrepair (leaky roofs, bat infestations) that the money would be better used in upkeep than new construction. Although the initial donation for Sook was specific to that purpose, the subsequent donations cannibalized other projects. Also, Sook adds one more facility that has to compete for maintenance dollars. I find this argument effective at presenting some of the costs of Sook, but I don't find anyone in this camp making an honest attempt at presenting the benefits (probably because they also subscribe to either point #1, or "We just hate athletics"). It also should be noted that if enough weight is given to 'arguments' of this type, then how would the university ever grow - you couldn't build anything new.
Last Edited: 4/18/2017 9:02:35 AM by NewAthenian
mail
person
rpbobcat
4/18/2017 9:59 AM
NewAthenian wrote:expand_more
I don't see how anone can be against Sook which is providing ACADEMIC help to our athletes. Even the people who hate athletics.
Disclaimer: The following opinions are not necessarily mine, and I may fail to reproduce them accurately. However, it is my understanding that the opposition from Sook comes from two avenues. (Other than "We just hate athletics")

One is the idea that creating an academic space only for athletes sets them apart from other students, and this is an undesirable outcome for a university body. I am agnostic on this point, and so have little more to say about it.

The other is of course the money. Some feel that so many other facilities on campus are in a sorry state of disrepair (leaky roofs, bat infestations) that the money would be better used in upkeep than new construction. Although the initial donation for Sook was specific to that purpose, the subsequent donations cannibalized other projects. Also, Sook adds one more facility that has to compete for maintenance dollars. I find this argument effective at presenting some of the costs of Sook, but I don't find anyone in this camp making an honest attempt at presenting the benefits (probably because they also subscribe to either point #1, or "We just hate athletics"). It also should be noted that if enough weight is given to 'arguments' of this type, then how would the university ever grow - you couldn't build anything new.
Where to begin:

1.As I understand it,the University's intention is for 100% of the cost of the Sook Center's design/construction to be paid for by donations.

I know, when the University solicited donations for Sook,every solicitation let you designate your donation for Sook only.

They also had "naming opportunities",like the IPF,where,for a $1000.00 donation you would get your name on a plaque on the building.

2.People either don't know,or forget, that O.U. already has an Academic Center for athletes.

Sook will be a larger,more modern replacement.

I also believe that the design will also let Sook function as a "Reception Center".

3.I played D1 soccer at O.U.
I wrestled D1 for F.D.U.
The time commitment needed for both athletics and academics,I was an engineering major,are hard to explain.
An Academic Center for athletes,something I wish I would have had,helps you make the most of the limited time you have available.
mail
mcbin
4/18/2017 10:16 PM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
But, if I was a university, I'd be pushing every donor possible towards scholarships.

Very un-sexy and little near term gain. But I totally agree with you.
mail
bornacatfan
4/18/2017 11:38 PM
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
for both athletics and academics,I was an engineering major,are hard to explain.
An Academic Center for athletes,something I wish I would have had,helps you make the most of the limited time you have available.
Good perspective. Thanks for the inside view from a student athlete.
mail
bornacatfan
4/19/2017 12:20 AM
Just in case anyone is not keeping up Miami board has moved http://test.miamihawktalk.com/talk/categories/mens-basket...
Last Edited: 4/19/2017 12:21:59 AM by bornacatfan
mail
person
Alan Swank
4/19/2017 9:06 AM
mcbin wrote:expand_more
But, if I was a university, I'd be pushing every donor possible towards scholarships.

Very un-sexy and little near term gain. But I totally agree with you.
Not sure what you mean by "un-sexy" Ben. I've helped spearhead an endowed scholarship drive at Muskingum in the name of a now deceased fraternity brother who is in the Ohio Trainers Hall of Fame. Giving to that fund year after year has been gratifying for many and there is no plaque with anyone's name on it. I guess what I'm asking deals with the motivation of an individual to give. Does giving to facilities carry greater weight than to scholarships for those in need or who exhibit outstanding qualities? Personally i prefer to give to specific defined purposes/causes but you can't do that and get your seats with the same dollars and the pocketbook is only so deep.
mail
person
Deciduous Forest Cat
4/19/2017 3:07 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
But, if I was a university, I'd be pushing every donor possible towards scholarships.

Very un-sexy and little near term gain. But I totally agree with you.
Not sure what you mean by "un-sexy" Ben. I've helped spearhead an endowed scholarship drive at Muskingum in the name of a now deceased fraternity brother who is in the Ohio Trainers Hall of Fame. ****Giving to that fund year after year has been gratifying for many and there is no plaque with anyone's name on it.**** I guess what I'm asking deals with the motivation of an individual to give. Does giving to facilities carry greater weight than to scholarships for those in need or who exhibit outstanding qualities? Personally i prefer to give to specific defined purposes/causes but you can't do that and get your seats with the same dollars and the pocketbook is only so deep.
I think you just answered your own question Alan. You seemed to interpret it the exact opposite way mcbin intended. He said it's "un-sexy" because there aren't plaques on the wall and named buildings, but the gift has intrinsic value.
mail
person
Buckeye to Bobcat
4/19/2017 4:15 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
But, if I was a university, I'd be pushing every donor possible towards scholarships.

Very un-sexy and little near term gain. But I totally agree with you.
Not sure what you mean by "un-sexy" Ben. I've helped spearhead an endowed scholarship drive at Muskingum in the name of a now deceased fraternity brother who is in the Ohio Trainers Hall of Fame. ****Giving to that fund year after year has been gratifying for many and there is no plaque with anyone's name on it.**** I guess what I'm asking deals with the motivation of an individual to give. Does giving to facilities carry greater weight than to scholarships for those in need or who exhibit outstanding qualities? Personally i prefer to give to specific defined purposes/causes but you can't do that and get your seats with the same dollars and the pocketbook is only so deep.
I think you just answered your own question Alan. You seemed to interpret it the exact opposite way mcbin intended. He said it's "un-sexy" because there aren't plaques on the wall and named buildings, but the gift has intrinsic value.
+1 Precisely. Endowments are not initially sexy because it goes to sit in an account for a while until it matures. Unlike a check up front that gives the idiot control of it immediately, endowments can survive an idiot using the cash all at once, especially with stipulations on it. Hence why I feel comfortable doing that versus giving to a general kitty that can be spent at some idiot's discretion.
Showing Messages: 26 - 33 of 33
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)