The solution here is actually a simple one, but requires a step nobody will be willing to take.
To improve as a basketball conference and become a two bid league, the MAC can't also compete at the BCS level in football.
Gonzaga, VCU, Wichita State, Butler, Creighton, Dayton, Xavier, St. Mary's, Richmond, George Mason, and on and on and on all have something in common.
To become a two bid league you need to spend more money. To spend more money you need to stop spending so much money on football.
We're not even eligible for a national championship in football. But we still want to act like we're on par with Ohio State.
The best place for OU to be is putting more resources into basketball and fewer into football. We could be a perennial playoff team in FCS and competing for one of multiple bids in basketball year in and year out.
Instead we're content being a middling team, playing for little of consequence, and eating scraps that the others don't want.
The MAC is paid a handsome sum for the most part to participate as one of 120ish schools in FBS FB. Why would they want to walk away from that in order to not get paid to be one of 350ish schools in D1 BB? (asking for a friend)
And to your point, we already spend more than St. Mary's, who you cite above, so is FB really a problem?
122) Ohio University-Main Campus 3,101,150
123) University of Akron Main Campus 3,088,920
124) Siena College 3,083,128
125) New Mexico State University-Main Campus 3,003,045
126) Saint Mary's College of California 2,956,340
Outside of Akron, we spend 33% to 100% more than our MAC brethren, so is our perceived lack of spending on MBB really standing in the way of our success, or are we failing to maximize our performance versus our spend in MBB?
Do you have evidence/data that proves that Men's Basketball is a more valuable marketing investment than FB? OHIO spends in the middle of the MAC in FB budget, and in the lower third in FBS, yet we seem to always find ourselves on television seven to ten times a year, so relatively speaking, isn't that a valuable use of marketing funds?
Last Edited: 4/26/2017 3:18:11 PM by D.A.