Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: AAC Requiring $10 Million Athlete Revenue Share Per School
Page: 1 of 1
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,572
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/24/2021
Post Count: 3,656
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 3/13/2025 2:18 PM
"Failure to reach $10 million over three years could jeopardize a school's membership."

Interesting.

$3M is no paltry sum for these guys. Of course, it's gonna be stretched across 3 years and (mostly) two sports, but I was looking through the compiled data from USAToday and they're not exactly sitting on piles of cash.

Profit from available data (March/24):
Cincy - $7M
Houston - $4.2M
Memphis - $0 (Must do math like we do, have to cover losses with fees and get to flat)
SFU - -$6M (wowsers)
ECU - $800K

As always, will be interesting to see how these schools adapt and if it rolls out to others. Gonna be a lot of capologists added to these front ofices.
https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,792
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 3/14/2025 6:21 AM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
"Failure to reach $10 million over three years could jeopardize a school's membership."

Interesting.

$3M is no paltry sum for these guys. Of course, it's gonna be stretched across 3 years and (mostly) two sports, but I was looking through the compiled data from USAToday and they're not exactly sitting on piles of cash.

Profit from available data (March/24):
Cincy - $7M
Houston - $4.2M
Memphis - $0 (Must do math like we do, have to cover losses with fees and get to flat)
SFU - -$6M (wowsers)
ECU - $800K

As always, will be interesting to see how these schools adapt and if it rolls out to others. Gonna be a lot of capologists added to these front ofices.
https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances

What am I missing in the fact that you list Cincinnati? Aren’t they in the Big12
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,811
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 3/14/2025 10:37 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
"Failure to reach $10 million over three years could jeopardize a school's membership."

Interesting.

$3M is no paltry sum for these guys. Of course, it's gonna be stretched across 3 years and (mostly) two sports, but I was looking through the compiled data from USAToday and they're not exactly sitting on piles of cash.

Profit from available data (March/24):
Cincy - $7M
Houston - $4.2M
Memphis - $0 (Must do math like we do, have to cover losses with fees and get to flat)
SFU - -$6M (wowsers)
ECU - $800K

As always, will be interesting to see how these schools adapt and if it rolls out to others. Gonna be a lot of capologists added to these front ofices.
https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances

What am I missing in the fact that you list Cincinnati? Aren’t they in the Big12
So is Houston...
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 3/14/2025 10:47 AM
So if the MAC does this, where will we get the additional revenue or what will be cut to provide these payments?
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,811
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 3/14/2025 10:54 AM
I think we need to come to grips with the reality that Division I at the MAC level (or Sun Belt, MWC or CUSA for that matter) may look drastically different depending on what is approved of with the House Settlement in July. There are some schools that are thinking about dropping sports altogether at lower levels, and Division I schools that are thinking about reclassifying.

https://www.extrapointsmb.com/p/here-s-why-i-m-hearing-mo...
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,642
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 3/14/2025 1:10 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
So if the MAC does this, where will we get the additional revenue or what will be cut to provide these payments?
Other sports, superfluous athletic department employees, facilities investments, etc.

But the MAC can't afford this, and it would be silliness to pursue it.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 3/14/2025 3:35 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
So if the MAC does this, where will we get the additional revenue or what will be cut to provide these payments?
Other sports, superfluous athletic department employees, facilities investments, etc.

But the MAC can't afford this, and it would be silliness to pursue it.
Agreed. This take is most interesting and clearly lays out the difference between the haves and the have nothings.

https://nil-ncaa.com
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 3/14/2025 5:35 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
So if the MAC does this, where will we get the additional revenue or what will be cut to provide these payments?
Other sports, superfluous athletic department employees, facilities investments, etc.

But the MAC can't afford this, and it would be silliness to pursue it.
Agreed. This take is most interesting and clearly lays out the difference between the haves and the have nothings.

https://nil-ncaa.com
Great info link. And very depressing........
Showing Messages: 1 - 9 of 9



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)