I sit on the fence on this issue. I certainly think nutrition is important and should be a priority. I don't think I want to spend the most, nor do I want to spend the least. I can see some schools like Alabama touting they spend 3.6M, and you're special, yada, yada, come here and you'll eat like kings every day. There is an arms race already going on with facilities and amenities.
I agree entirely Giacomo, I am torn on this issue, because I do see the benefit of the investment but the excess is mind-blowing.
Reading about "Bison Burgers" and "Mahi-Mahi steak" seems like ridiculous excess. You certainly don't "NEED" any of that stuff to practice good nutrition, but at the same time it doesn't hurt. I absolutely believe taking it to that extreme can significantly help you get more out of your training, recover better/faster which is a pretty good recipe to perform better and increase your odds of winning more games.
...
Athletes DO have unique nutrition needs compared to most students let alone the average American. I read an article that Lebron spends over $1m a year on his body and I don't believe that includes a very specific diet and his own personal chef. I remember reading about Michael Phelps ABSURD 10,000 calorie diet preparing for the Olympics. While many Americans think about their diet in terms of losing weight, athletes are trying to get calories to build lean muscle and fuel their performance/recovery.
On the flip-side, I don't think there is an issue more polarizing when comparing "athlete benefits" to the "normal student." I remember my mother who was an athlete at Ohio once made a comment mirroring what OCF's wife said regarding the football meals compared to the meals of other athletes. I wasn't an athlete at Ohio but the #1 complaint I heard from my non-athlete friends about athletics was the differences in what they ate compared to normal dining hall food. FWIW, I know dining hall food overall has been massively revamped in the last couple years at Ohio which I think is important and a good move by the school to cater to students today.
In the Sun Belt Conference, Texas State is spending $380,000 for a training table, $50,000 for a snack station and $12,500 for a campus professor to counsel athletes on nutrition.
$12,500 for advice from a nutrition professor seems like a reasonable "middle-ground" and a building block for us (assuming you could get the academics to buy-in and fully support the cause)
The article did say we spend the most in the MAC so maybe we are already doing something like this. I'd be curious to know what we programs we currently have in place. It seems like there could be some small investments in this area that would go a long way.
...
Borna's comments about Groce are interesting. They specifically mentioned Akron in the article with the AD their faulting their poor performance down the stretch in hoops a couple years back on nutrition. They said a basketball coaches wife now fills in part-time consulting with players.
Last Edited: 1/2/2018 1:25:01 PM by The Optimist