I love Zach Butler's game. I think he'll be absolutely outstanding in time.
I agree. He should have had a number of assists last night and is a true PG which we need. Kirk has a skillset we really need as well but he just doesn't have a true PG mindset.
I am just the opposite IMHO. Butler has been a head down, score first player. Seeing the floor or the spacing/players has been sorely lacking. Facilitate has not been part of the conversation. I was just amazed when he went into the key 2nd half and actually PASSED the ball. In my eyes Kirk has kicked out and kept the ball hot consistently. Still a work in progress but were I one of the other 4 on the floor presently I think I might actually have my hands up looking for a pass with Number 4. Just my take. I think they both have good skills (basketball and PG). How they choose to use and develope them is to be seen. One thing for sure....they could both use some work on shot mechanics. When the student is ready.....
AGREE
I'm with Borna here. I like both of our freshmen, but Kirk has been a better facilitator at PG to date. Doesn't mean it will always be that way. Stats don't always tell the whole picture but -
Kirk in 241 minutes : 90 FGA, 27 AST, 28 TO.
Butler in 115 minutes : 29 FGA, 3 AST, 10 TO.
Kirk 14.938 FGA/40 minutes
Butler 10.087 FGA/40 minutes
So Kirk does shoot it more frequently than Butler - but
Kirk 4.481 AST/40 minutes
Butler 1.043 AST/40 minutes (OUCH!) - though Kirk's isn't sparkly either.
Kirk 0.964 AST/TO ratio (Again not great, but for a true freshmen it's okay as long as it improves)
Butler 0.300 AST/TO ratio (OUCH!)
I know we're still in small sample size territory but I don't know how you can call a guy averaging barely 1 assist per 40 minutes and who has a 0.3 assist to turnover ratio the "true PG". Even if he doesn't shoot as often.