Another thing to consider: right or wrong, is Saul ball really all that exciting for a casual basketball viewer to watch? I mean, it's efficient in the way that the Spurs or the Grizzlies of recent years is efficient. But are there any can't-miss players? There's no DJ Cooper or Maurice Ndour or even a Devaughn Washington that does flashy things. Don't get me wrong, I'd rather win than be flashy (both would be great), but truth be told, I'd like to see amazing athleticism every once in a while too.
You're going way too deep. The students that aren't going have absolutely no idea the type of basketball we play.
I'm not so sure, I actually think Shabs may have hit one of the potential reasons on the head. I am a casual hoops fan who doesn't fully understand the deep X's/O's of modern hoops, and granted, I am far more engaged in OHIO ICA than the average student, and I openly admit that Saulball isn't a compelling product for me. You can't tell me that out of a student body of 20+k students on campus, you don't have a volume of enough former high school men and women that played hoops, were on spirit squads or were regular supporters of their high school teams, not to mention professional fans (in Lebron James/Cavs country) who wouldn't want to attend a compelling product in person with a premier seat location like the bleachers without having to pay for a ticket at the door.
I have had detailed conversations with knowledgeable hoops posters on this board, and members of the athletic department, and I still am yet to have someone explain to me why what turns me off about our present state of the program is simply due to me being a novice/don't know better/should just accept that the game is too erudite for me. And this is coming from a guy who planned a week long trip around the Charleston Classic.
We are in year four of the new program, and I like Saul A LOT as a person. He is a great father with a great family, they love Athens and OHIO, and his story during the NDSU run was certainly "one shining moment". However, for a head coach who is paid at the top of MAC, a program that outspends all of its MAC peers in Hoops budget and clearly has the best facility in the Conference, I simply no longer find OHIO hoops a must watch. Since the Iona game, which I found to be a pretty lame last 30 minutes, I haven't caught any of the games on live streaming, and I'm not sure if I'll be back in that frame of mind the remainder of the season except when it conveniently fits my schedule.
To win in the Saul system, you better be able to outwork/communicate the opponent for 40 minutes, be significantly more successful in shooting percentage from the floor and line than your opponents, highly value every offensive possession and limit opponent's offensive second chances. However, as was evidenced in the first halves against ISU and Dayton, this team is often completely unfocused, does not communicate well with one another and is completely hot and cold in shooting. And if as a program you plan not to "employ" bulk and athleticism in the roster in lieu of finesse players that will outwork the competition, and perform as we do for considerable stretches, we are going to have some nights where we are completely out to lunch, get obliterated on the boards (particularly in allowing offensive rebounds), shoot sub 45%/80% and get beaten by teams that we wouldn't have previously, often in our own house.
There used to be a time when we were a very tough out in our own house, and that hasn't been the case the last couple of years. I simply just won't make the product "must watch live", where I used to never miss a webcast. I don't want us to fail by any means, I hope this system can work eventually, but in year four, with almost exclusively "his" own roster, I really hoped we would be much farther along now than we are, especially considering our investment versus our peers.
Conversely, if I were a donor or a student of UB, and I knew I would be watching the athleticism of the Bulls night in, night out, I would be tuned in or attending live every night, because those guys can jump out of the gym and they play a very aggressive, physical style, which I find very entertaining.
And I'll play this back to our recent past, where OHIO hoops was "must see live" for me. During Groce's era, that guy was on the razor's edge every night. There were nights early in his regime when we got run out of our own gym, but that guy was freaking passionate every night, and you could always rely on the entertainment of foot stomps, skier face, table punches...that guy left it on the floor every night. I found that exponentially more compelling than Saul's style, which is more moderated and nuanced. Again, I like Saul a lot, very nice guy and funny/humble, but stylistically, sometimes he is just too laissez faire to get me sucked into his program.
Now if Saul were able to build a team to succeed in the system he is employing, and the team members are bringing the same intensity that the Bo Ryan era Wisconsin teams did, who REALLY outworked their opponents for 40 minutes and shot the rock the way many of those teams did, I'd be back in, night in, night out. I like many of our players, I just am not seeing a 10 deep bench that is going to be able to deliver against the promise of this style that can beat teams that are built like the Buffalo's of this conference, not to mention other mid major peers. We are top third percentile in D1 budget, but I'm not feeling this core as being able to deliver to our level of spend.
So despite how "novice" the student body is on hoops, if the games are not an event where we have a high probability of protecting our home floor, I wouldn't undersell Shabamon's premise that people aren't finding the product compelling.
Last Edited: 12/11/2017 4:56:37 PM by D.A.