Yeah, because Groce was stellar in regular season league play. Almost unbeatable.
He wasnt this bad
Well, to be fair let's look at what the data actually says.
John Groce - 4 years: 2008-2012
Overall Record: 85-56 (.603)
MAC Regular Season: 34-30 (.531)
MAC Tournament: 9-2 (.889)
MAC Total (Reg+Tournament): 43-32 (.573)
OOC Total: 38-21 (.644)
Post-Season: 4-3 (.571) - 2 NCAA, 1 CIT
Saul Phillips - 3.5+ years: 2014-2018
Overall Record: 62-53 (.539)
MAC Regular Season: 29-32 (.475)
MAC Tournament: 2-3 (.400)
MAC Total (Reg+Tournament): 31-35 (.470)
OOC Total: 29-17 (.630)
Post-Season: 2-1 (.667) - 1 CBI
-----
So to summarize, Groce was better overall, he was slightly better in OOC and MAC regular season - but takes SP to the woodshed in the post-season (results to be expected).
How MUCH better was he? Well, if we extrapolate their respective MAC winning percentages over an 18 game MAC schedule (I'll use total for this example - meaning regular season + tournament) then Groce would win (18*.573 = 10.31 games) while Phillips would win (18*.470 = 8.46 games). So in MAC play Groce won, on average, 1.85 more games per 18 - or basically an extra win every 9 games played.
*Edit to add: Interesting that Groce won OOC at a 64% clip and then won in the MAC at 57%. Saul, on the other hand wins 63% of OOC but then falls to 47% in the MAC. Dude can't win MAC games which makes it hard to get to the NCAA's.
Last Edited: 1/24/2018 12:13:25 AM by GraffZ06