The team has been injured and missing major pieces all season.
You don't think an Ohio team with Pavs/Mitchell/Brown/Hadaway/Clayton as it's healthy starting 5 and a combo of Sheldon/Elliott/James/Searls off the bench isn't a top 1/2 team in the MAC? We'll never know because we never got to see it, but the only team that could even remotely hang with that team is Akron IMO. [/QUOTE]I am not convinced it is, no. I think it's a team than can beat anybody in the conference shooting well, but would be wildly inconsistent and be bad defensively and on the boards. That lineup includes a 5 who isn't a 5, and a 4 that was recruited as a 3.
It is, in fact, our second most used lineup. And it's net efficiency is -11.3. Largely because it's a very bad defensive lineup.
You say the issues wouldn't be fixed by full health. The 2nd and 3rd best teams in the conference are Miami and Toledo - who we just lost to by 3 and 4, minus our best 2 players. To think we aren't better than them at full strength is either disingenuous or you're just pushing an agenda.
I suspect we are about on par with them at full strength, probably a bit better. But like I said, this team has been very inconsistent and it's undersized and defends poorly. I don't think Clayton and Hadaway instantly make us head and shoulders better than those teams; we saw what we looked like with them healthy. We haven't beaten anybody good, and lost plenty of games we shouldn't have.
[QUOTE=GraffZ06]
Boals isn't the 4th winningest coach in OU history, with an NCAA tourney win under his belt, because he doesn't know how to put a competitive team on the floor and/or coach them up into what he ultimately wants.