menu
99+
Private Messages
New!
Edit Profile
Logout
Bobcat Attack Menu
Basketball
Basketball News
Schedule/Results
Recruiting
Football
Football News
Schedule/Results
Recruiting
Message Board
Message Home
Basketball
Basketball Recruiting
Football
Football Recruiting
The O Zone
Volleyball
Baseball
Ohio Olympic Sports...
General OU Discussion...
Website Feedback...
Posting Policy
Chat
Site Links
Site Search
About Us
Contact Us
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Basketball
Basketball News
Schedule/Results
Recruiting
Football
Football News
Schedule/Results
Recruiting
Message Board
Message Home
Basketball
Basketball Recruiting
Football
Football Recruiting
The O Zone
Volleyball
Baseball
Ohio Olympic Sports...
General OU Discussion...
Website Feedback...
Posting Policy
Chat
Site Links
More...
Site Search
About Us
Contact Us
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
99+
Private Messages
New!
Edit Profile
Logout
Ohio Baseball Topic
Message Home
Ohio Baseball
Topic:
2nd place in MAC
Page:
1
of
1
whocaresgobobcats
General User
W
Member Since:
8/29/2011
Post Count:
519
person
mail
whocaresgobobcats
mail
Posted:
4/16/2012
11:17 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Only 2 behind Kent with a very favorable schedule. Tough loss in Game 3 against Ball State, but still have a legit chance at winning the MAC. Streich is getting healthy and Choban and Moulton are throwing very well. Setting up quite nicely. Not to mention Newton's recent hot streak.
Donuts
General User
D
Member Since:
9/22/2010
Post Count:
734
person
mail
Donuts
mail
Posted:
4/17/2012
10:56 AM
settings_applications
edit_note
I'll be sold when they play teams that aren't a combined 18-51.
The MAC overall is terrible this year. Ball State played more like a decent high school team than a college team in the game I saw.
Its all Boeh's Fault
General User
IABF
Member Since:
8/6/2005
Post Count:
76
person
mail
Its all Boeh's Fault
mail
Posted:
4/17/2012
3:55 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
I would have to agree that the MAC is pretty terrible this year. Only Kent and Ohio have winning records, and only 4 and 5 wins above .500 at that.
So yea, its definitely a favorable schedule because everyone besides Kent is really bad. Hopefully Ohio can finish strong, get a good seed in the MAC tourney, and steal a 'ship in one of the worst years for the conference in recent memory.
Donuts
General User
D
Member Since:
9/22/2010
Post Count:
734
person
mail
Donuts
mail
Posted:
4/20/2012
11:45 AM
settings_applications
edit_note
Anything less than a sweep of Buffalo is a disappointment.
Last Edited: 4/20/2012 11:45:52 AM by Donuts
whocaresgobobcats
General User
W
Member Since:
8/29/2011
Post Count:
519
person
mail
whocaresgobobcats
mail
Posted:
4/20/2012
9:31 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
1 game out of first. Make all the excuses you want. They're beating the teams they need, that's all you can ask for.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since:
12/22/2004
Location:
Columbus, OH
Post Count:
5,636
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted:
4/27/2012
8:59 AM
settings_applications
edit_note
11-4, let's get that MAC title!
ts1227
General User
T1227
Member Since:
2/28/2006
Location:
Tallmadge, OH
Post Count:
880
person
mail
ts1227
mail
Posted:
4/29/2012
8:14 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
To play Devil's advocate, a good year this year could lead to an increased shot of them staying inside the program for a new coach, which is generally viewed as not desirable.
Diamond Cat
General User
Member Since:
12/21/2004
Post Count:
972
mail
Diamond Cat
mail
Posted:
4/29/2012
8:33 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Not by more than 100 former players that I know.
You must know a ton of people from Facebook.
Donuts
General User
D
Member Since:
9/22/2010
Post Count:
734
person
mail
Donuts
mail
Posted:
4/29/2012
9:37 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Diamond Cat
wrote:
expand_more
Not by more than 100 former players that I know.
You must know a ton of people from Facebook.
Do all of your buddies still want Coach Malinowski?
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since:
12/22/2004
Location:
Columbus, OH
Post Count:
5,636
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted:
4/29/2012
11:00 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Tough series at BG...Outscore them 21-12 but drop 2 of 3. But a sweep next weekend would pull us even with Kent for 1st. Unlikely, but possible.
Donuts
General User
D
Member Since:
9/22/2010
Post Count:
734
person
mail
Donuts
mail
Posted:
5/6/2012
11:55 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Andrew Ruck
wrote:
expand_more
Tough series at BG...Outscore them 21-12 but drop 2 of 3. But a sweep next weekend would pull us even with Kent for 1st. Unlikely, but possible.
Well, the sweep prediction was right.
JSF
General User
Member Since:
1/29/2005
Location:
Houston, TX
Post Count:
6,572
mail
JSF
mail
Posted:
5/7/2012
12:01 AM
settings_applications
edit_note
Reality check?
Donuts
General User
D
Member Since:
9/22/2010
Post Count:
734
person
mail
Donuts
mail
Posted:
5/7/2012
2:00 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Ehh, yes and no I suppose.
Yes, as in, this team was not going to compete for a MAC regular season title. The schedule was extremely favorable for them at the beginning of the year.
However, no, because I still think they will slightly exceed expectations.
Besides, this team is young...
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since:
12/22/2004
Location:
Columbus, OH
Post Count:
5,636
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted:
5/9/2012
2:44 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Definitely got smacked in the mouth. Hopefully we can finish well with Akron & Miami and have a decent showing in the tourney to have a somewhat high note heading into the "new era."
Unread Messages Remain
There are more unread messages in this topic.
Would you like to jump to the next unread message or return to the message listing?
Next Unread
Back to Listing
Showing Messages:
1
-
14
of
14
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links
chevron_left
Sunday, April 19, 2026
chevron_right
sports_football
Spring Game Notebook: Ohio’s early standouts, quarterback battle and much-needed reps
Athens Messenger
extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)