I see that we are lacking a closer. It is a shame that they fought so hard to take the lead in the top of the tenth only to blow it in the bottom of the tenth.
Closers are a myth.
Why?
The numbers tell the story (Bill James did the research and Joe Posnanski has mentioned it a few times in his writing): "Closers" have had zero bearing on a team's chances of winning. The odds of winning with a lead in the ninth inning are the same now as they were 60 years ago.
I'm not saying there isn't value in a bullpen ace of sorts. But what situation needs it more: The beginning of an inning or with two runners on and one out?