Seems to me you are giving an assistant coach an awful lot of blame for a program's success, especially when you take it all the way back to his first year or two as a coach. Heck, for all we know Coach See made a couple players outstanding and that lead to a much better record than those schools would have had without him on staff! Possibly the Ohio winning % could have been around 30% without him on staff. Just sayin
Who did he make "outstanding" though? Please provide examples. Also, remember that he is the head pitching coach. For a team that had 5 pitchers drafted in the 5 years before Toadvine's death, Ohio will finally break their drafted pitcher drought this season with Streich. Let's be honest, Streich was getting drafted if he went to Rio Grande. So I guess I don't really see a bunch of progression with players.
Team ERA since See has arrived has peaked as 5th best in the MAC since his arrival. However, I'll give him a pass somewhat on that because Trautwein Field is a launching pad.
Walk since See has arrived have been a huge issue, minus in 2009 when they allowed the 2nd fewest in the MAC. Can't fault that on the home field.
I did find one category Ohio dominates at since 2007 when it comes to pitching: Wild pitches.
Like I've said in the past, See could end up being a decent coach somewhere. Just not at Ohio. I just don't see how anyone can look at how this program has been and say "Oh yeah, that looks good. Let's keep the two top assistants and have Carbone still have an input because you know he'll be around. Keep this train rollin'!"